Hi again knight and thanks for your response!
Sorry if I misinterpreted you at some point. Of course, I fit your criticisms constructively and I have always tried to answer your questions not with the aim of saying "this is what you get, you draw the conclusions".
I hope my answer is more conciliatory and you can understand our value proposition! :)
First of all, Scope's sense is to help IT Managers have data. What kind of data?
1. Know the workflow of engineers: frequency of commits, pull-requests and revisions. With this data, we can know exactly the productivity peaks, the days where you work the most and the time slot where you are most productive.
2. Know the duration of the tasks: with a historical data, software factories can adjust budgets better and have a better idea of how long it can take them to finish a specific project for a client. We can see two things: the duration of tasks at the project level and at the engineer level. We help to know the evolution of time by days, weeks and months on both levels.
3. Know how the tasks are related among engineers, (this is on the roadmap, not in production). We want to throw data to know how the tasks are distributed among the engineers, how the reviews work among them, what level of involvement exists, how the workflow with the PRs improves, number of comments by type of task or by person, .. We are working on providing data that can help to better structure processes internally. With this, we want to get engineers to communicate more with each other and increase motivation and the level of involvement among colleagues.
4. Impact of the tasks. At a low, medium and high level. We establish criteria based on an algorithm (constantly evolving) based on good practices within the code: comments, revisions, affected dependencies, modified lines, labels, commit message, type of task, etc. With this, we help you understand the impact level of each pull-request in the code. We help detect talent, lack of motivation, progress from a junior to senior engineer, ... We want to connect with Sonarqube tools to really see if that impact we reflect is directly related to the technical debt in Sonarqube.
And on the roadmap, there are more things. We want to make a very cool tool, and feedbacks like yours help us greatly!
Once again, thanks knight! Anything, write me again!