That said, the FBI is not in the pre-crime business (with few exceptions), so they're not really set up to warn businesses like I did for so many years.
That said, the FBI is not in the pre-crime business (with few exceptions), so they're not really set up to warn businesses like I did for so many years.
This seems like a bit of a systemic defect, if you can watch a financial (etc.) crime in progress but not have the jurisdiction (or allocation) to intercede.
p.s. Shouldn't some of this fall into USSS jurisdiction?
I guess those pre-crime exceptions are the ones were the agent convinces the malcontents they're embedded with to try a little terrorism?
That's the exception, you have to justify your job and budget somehow. And nothing loosens purse-strings like the 'T-word' post 9/11. Although to be fair, the first attempt to bomb the WTC was a failed FBI Sting:
https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-pro...
[“Protecting our senior citizens from criminals who target them is one of the Trump Administration’s highest priorities”](https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-...)
Sadly, the FBI is apparently not in the business of going after the king pin either. They are prosecuting the low level money mules, who are either unwilling or unable to comprehend the need to cease and desist after a letter from the FBI.