> The reality is that people can value something different than you (less government intervention, less restrictions on speech, lower taxes)
Why do you assume we don't value those things? Isn't that _you_ being condescending now?
Why do you assume we don't value those things? Isn't that _you_ being condescending now?
An assumption isn't necessarily condescending. I assumed I was talking to someone on the left side of politics and was giving examples for the sake of an argument. If those examples do not in fact work then I can just as well pick other ones.
> Why do you use the word "we"? I wasn't directing my comment to you.
Indeed this is a communication mystery.
> Why do you assume we don't value those things? Isn't that _you_ being condescending now?
If you assume people do share the values, or if you assume they do not, you are still assuming to know their values. Better to just ask the person and start the conversation from there rather than shut down debate with something along the lines of "You'd agree with me if you weren't misled by X".