Furthermore, quantum mechanics isn’t really an “optional extra” for our universe, it’s too important, eg none of the materials or chemicals you see around you make any sense without quantum mechanics.
Furthermore, quantum mechanics isn’t really an “optional extra” for our universe, it’s too important, eg none of the materials or chemicals you see around you make any sense without quantum mechanics.
So, if the base of the reality is designed around something on an atomic level, when you zoom in past a given level, it would stop making sense if the program was designed to continually add complexity as it is studied more and more, perhaps in the effort of discouraging people form thinking that they are in a simulation :)
I almost can't tell what side you're on.
I think if we are in a simulation, both approaches must be used in tandem. Rather like how so many ALife concepts are now fully absorbed in AI frameworks, even though one is clearly bottom-up and the other top-down. The good stuff is in the middle somewhere.