Google To Develop ISP Throttling Detector
hothardware.com
hothardware.com
My guess is that most ISPs do no throttling outside of peer-to-peer filesharing.
However it's a brilliant strategy nonetheless. It's essentially crowdsourcing the policing of ISPs.
Both sides have their turf to defend. Comcast saves money by throtting bandwidth, Google makes money by making sure no site with AdSense is throttled.
I just hope it isn't government rulings that decide this in the end.
Does that mean someone else is paying for me? I.E. most people surf less and there for don't use the 50$ dllars they pay?
I mean how is this actually working, internet used to be expensive like 10 years ago when you paid per hour and had a modem.
I thought it was so cheap now because it is cheap to let people have the bandwidth.
I don't really get this issue with wanting to control what people access. Why don't the broadbandproviders charge you for how much bandwidth you use instead?
Bandwidth certainly is cheap, and constantly getting cheaper, but the average consumer's bandwidth usage is also increasing. A few years ago, as filesharing became mainstream, broadband ISPs found it much more costly to provide unlimited service. Their ways of managing this extra cost include some throttling but also, interestingly, a proliferation of local peering.
Local peering is when two small ISPs, say in a single city, notice they are both paying their ISPs in order to send traffic to each other, and decide to instead run a line between themselves and exchange traffic on that line instead of paying their ISPs. There was never any reason to do this sort of peering on a local level until we all started sharing music and movies with other folks in our neighborhoods; the increased demand has led ISPs to make a lot of the bandwidth we use less costly for them.