That's brave - one bug and you could have people walking into a minefield that you've told them was somewhere else.
In this case, I think it really depends on the use-cases and whether proper warnings are displayed.
This helps a lot, but it's not a replacement for brain.
When using OpenSea map or any other nautical chart I understand that just because some rocks, wrecks, etc are marked there is no guarantee, that there cannot be more.
He is not marked area as "cleared of mines"
I worry more about e.g. defibrillators. They might break or be removed af being put on OSM, and we do not want people running the wrong way when time is short.
Edit: I'm now on some NSA list, aren't I? Hi guys! Just finished Snowden's book, it was great!
Here's an example mine area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/627538334#map=17/44.32936/...
I would suggest adopting hazard=minefield (in addition to the other tags you use) for use on paths/roads/routable objects going over or skirting the minefields as well. The hazard-tag is a proposal, but has been used in the field a good number of times (coincidentally, a few times in Serbia).
Do you have any more documentation on what you're doing, how you're doing it? That sounds interesting. Any OSM Wiki page about the project?