Nearly half of American workers have low-wage jobs
knoe.com
knoe.com
I'd have thought, since fundamentally union membership is about private contracts between employers and a group of workers, that conservatives would see it as an alternative to government stepping in and setting up minimum wages.
If we had friendlier labor laws and we allowed more groups of workers to organize, the need for the federal government to step in with wage floors would decrease and, importantly, there would be more flexibility for employers AND employees -- like instead of paying above a certain minimum wage both sides could agree to more generous healthcare and/or retirement packages.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservatism_in_the_United_Sta...
Modern conservatism is not so well-defined. I'd say "conservatism" is best defined by the values of people who call themselves conservative, not by political theorists. And that therefore that it's more partisan and tribal than ideological.
At least in the US, I attribute this to "big business" interests being a major faction in the Republican coalition, more due to contributions of money than votes. Their ideology is ultimately self-interest, they benefit from weak unions/worker disorganization, and have the resources to promote their self-interested view as that of the party/ideology. They've been successful, because most people have more of a political tribal identity which dictates their positions than a well-thought-out ideology.
The problem comes in with compulsory contracts were like “Hey, you now deal with all of us”
- Are theses low-wage jobs only considering full time jobs? - What about student jobs? - If some people have multiple part-time jobs but all of them individually fall under the median annual wages of $18,000, then they are increasing the statistics
If you were just asking for additional context in the article, that's one thing, but this is certainly not "misleading."
The site implies that $0.52/hour leaves you better off than "the average labourer in Ghana [making] just $0.08 in the same time".
Also, why do you assume a 2000 hour work year is common worldwide? It's not.
This is saying it puts you in the 67th percentile when adjusting for purchasing power, which is still saying a lot.