A newly updated index ranks English proficiency around the world
economist.com
economist.com
> These results are not comprehensive, however. Nor are they representative. EF’s index is based on the results of a free online test taken by 2.3m volunteers in 100 countries. Only people with an internet connection and time and willingness to take a test are included in the sample...
I almost stopped reading at this point.
> Such biases aside, the EF’s index produces results that are interesting...
I was taught that in scientific research one should never claim that her/his own research is interesting, not least because it's something that's up to the audience to decide.
> ... interesting, if not entirely scientific.
At least they are honest about it not being entirely scientific.
> This correlates with another factor: EF repeatedly finds that English skills are highly correlated with connections and openness to the rest of the world.
Openness...? By what measure?
Edit: typo.
Also, I wish people would stop doing such mental gymnastics just to complain - your comment is effectively attempting to amplify the shortcomings of the study that are pointed out in the article you are quoting by then quoting them and adding slightly snarky commentary. Why? The author does a fine job framing what the study actually accomplishes, in their opinion, and then assessing its utility.
On that same note, The Economist article is a commentary on the study and not written by the authors of the actual study. So when The Economist says the results are “interesting” that is not Education First (the company behind the study) claiming their own results are interesting... it is an audience member doing so. Please be accurate if you are going to nitpick so aggressively.
The fact is the article does provide interesting commentary on the outcome of a vast and interesting survey while clearly acknowledging the interesting issues with the data.
You are right, I completely missed that point when I commented and that is now an embarrassing mistake that I can only learn from and remind me to be more accurate in the future.
> Also, I wish people would stop doing such mental gymnastics just to complain - your comment is effectively attempting to amplify the shortcomings of the study that are pointed out in the article you are quoting by then quoting them and adding slightly snarky commentary.
I wasn't "attempting" to amplify those shortcomings, I was indeed amplifying those shortcomings.
Once you have acknowledged that there isn't sufficient evidence to make any solid conclusions then the only logical next step is to get more evidence to support or refute your hypothesis instead of coming up with "interesting" commentary.
It's not like the article is asking for help to get evidence to substantiate the study, or tries to give the reader any valuable, fact-based insights. So the fact that the author acknowledges that the study is "not entirely scientific" in multiple paragraphs, then proceed to use a misleading title and come up with conjectures to make the study seem more interesting/increase its value is a huge red flag to me.
Edit: typo.
However, there are nationalists who aren't welcoming if you are from a poor African country. They only welcome other races expect their own race -> African. It is mostly poor African people who think other Africans are coming to take their jobs. Good thing is that they don't have government support. Unlike in the US where it is the head of state telling people not to come to their country.
I suspect we even make our border to be porous just to allow other people to freely enter the country.
https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/59zyal/map_of_europ...
Apropos the sampling question: English proficiency is (in my experience) poor outside large German cities.
Among my neighbours, in an area of Eastern Berlin, far from gentrified places only 1-2 out of 10 adults between 30 and 50 years old can speak English fluently, half can somehow communicate.
I stayed in Pankow though, which is a residential area of East Berlin, and I literally wasn't able to communicate a word in English. There wasn't much sympathy or patience to be seen when I was trying to speak German either, only annoyance. Which surprised me somehow - I remember living in Denmark people were both supportive and amused when I attempted to communicate in their language.
They're not saying "All Germans speak English well", they're saying "In average, Germans speak worse than the Dutch, better than the French and much better than Kuwaitis."
The full report had a list of cities though, where Kuala Lumpur scored higher than Malaysia, so that's an interesting phenomenon how it's a city thing rather than a country thing.
As for Malaysia, English is not an "official language" however it is an official language in one state, and it is still an important language in government - particularly in the judiciary, where many cases are still conducted and judgements written in English. More importantly, it's the primary language in most larger private-sector businesses particularly in cities like KL where Malay is less dominant.
---
edit: unless we're interpreting you wrong, and you mean that you're surprised that Northern Europeans do better than some Commonwealth countries - ignoring the obvious massive bias issues with this "study" as a whole, I'd remember that Europe has higher quality education in general than the poorer Commonwealth countries.
And you're probably right that the bias in the study skews the results.
Another possible angle is how you measure "correct" English. American English and British English are technically two separate languages with separate rules. Should you measure the correctness of a Singaporean against either of those? Or should you measure them against some Singaporean English standard instead?
The Malaysian government doesn't do quite the same type of attempts at social engineering as the Singaporeans, so you don't see quite as many official denunciations of Manglish.
[1] https://www.gov.za/welcome-official-south-african-government...
Coincidentally his English teacher his last year in California and when he got to Germany were both Australian.
All that being said, outside big cities I haven't really encountered anyone in Germany with strong English.
Some are used by business people moved over for a couple of years concerned that their kids won't be able to pass the exams etc if they get out of the "home" system (though I figure if you're only visiting for a couple of years why not sample the local system..though in California that's pretty dire). The other reason is the opposite: the kids are integrated to be able to do things like little league or whatever but need to get some "home" education so they'll be able to move back.
If you live in Palo Alto there are even two German ones close by: one just across the north border in Menlo Park and one immediately south in Mountain View.
Not surprisingly the areas with native Germanic languages do the best in this survey.
My husband and I were taking a few weeks after college graduation to visit Europe. I had studied French in school, so we made stops in a few different French cities. In one city, Lille, we were chatting in the town square when a group of 3 teenage boys came running up to us. In perfect English, one said "You speak English!! Thank God! We're here on a school trip from (some city in the Netherlands) and need to take a photo with someone here for a scavenger hunt." They admitted that they were completely horrified of the prospect of having to attempt to speak French in France.
As a native English speaker who has German family and studied German I always have found that Dutch seems "halfway" between the two languages. I can usually figure out what a sentence means by reading it that way.
In Denmark, I can speak English to the cleaner, the security guard, the fast food seller, quite young children, the bus driver, and pensioners. Both in Copenhagen and smaller towns.
In the Netherlands, this has mixed results.
Writing can be mixed in Denmark. They are so confident in their ability, they don't check the result. I suspect few bothered to take the voluntary test this useless survey is based on.
(Source: I live in Denmark, I visit the Netherlands for work.)