Israel ended up a lot safer, so it wasn't all bad.
There is virtually no benefit for Americans to be in Afghanistan.
Invading Iraq was broadly popular among Americans with strong interests in Israeli security, but it was broadly unpopular in Israel’s military establishment. The closest thing to the Israeli military establishment’s consensus view was that invading and occupying Iraq was a poor choice for their own security. Given that, I cannot see why they would agitate for it. I also cannot see how, since the US decision processes that lead to Iraq 2, which were farcical, are well documented and do not suggest that Israel agitated for the invasion and occupation.
There are plenty of things to be mad at the Israeli government for. This is not one of them.
They have a $400b economy, trillions in wealth, and are set to become one of the 10 or 15 most affluent nations in world history. Their GDP per capita has gone from $20k in 2005 to $43k today (roughly passing Britain) and will soon surpass Canada, Germany, France etc. on its way to $60k in the next dozen years. The development approach they've been running is working extremely well (combined with a small population). If we were speaking only in economic terms, you'd need $10+ trillion to do it.
Now add on to that that the Israelis specifically want to be there for serious religious reasons and there is no way they're ever leaving willingly.
Baja Mexico would be a more logical relocation btw, assuming Mexico would sell the territory for some very large price.