>> if someone were truly eminent, then that person should be publicly conspicuous
rather doubtful, for a variety of reasons, but probably unlikely to affect their numbers
rather doubtful, for a variety of reasons, but probably unlikely to affect their numbers
I have "stealth wealth", most of it from savings and stock market investments. I don't like to draw attention to myself.
"stealth wealth" is not impact.
It occurs to me that the Fortune 500 is not the S&P 500, so I would question whether information about them is necessarily even as accessible as with a public company.
It's like, say, bringing up your Mensa membership in a job interview.