Comment by FabHK | Hacker News Reader

Comment by FabHK | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Yes, there are some 370 or so users [1] with an IP block exemption, but my request was denied. Just using a VPN habitually is not a good reason, it appears [2]:

> An editor with a credible editing record who would be affected by this measure may be exempted from the block at administrative discretion, allowing them to edit uninterrupted through the IP address range block. The conditions for granting this are that: the editor's normal (non-proxy) IP address will be disrupted by an IP address block placed on a range they usually edit on, through no fault of theirs.

My highlights. At any rate, I'm not going to invest more time and work into being allowed to contribute to Wikipedia.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ListUsers/ipblock-exem...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IP_block_exemption

EDIT to add: Discussion of that (IMHO silly) policy here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:IP_block_exempt...

Full disclosure: I am the author of the Wikipedia essay "Wikipedia has cancer". See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Guy_Macon/Wikipedia_has_C...

There are a huge number of trolls and vandals who would love to be able to avoid being blocked by using a VPN. Wikipedia has to balance the need to stop them with the need to let legitimate VPN users edit.

In May of 2018 I posted a request for Comment and got a clarification on who should be granted IPBE.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:IP_block_exempt...

The result of that discussion was:

:It's likely safe to say that administrator judgement on a case-by-case basis can decide whether the provided justification constitutes a legitimate need and whether that need is sufficient to grant IPBE.. it's pretty clear that the community at large likely also doesn't want it to be routinely granted, for lack of a better phrase, just because someone wants it and could hat-collect it. Someone should likely, for example, actually be affected by a block to request it and/or someone should probably be able to explain their need for the additional layer of privacy rather than just, 'Hey I want IPBE because I said the word privacy.' "

That was the decision of the Wikipedia community. If you think that decision was "silly" you are free to post an RfC and see if the consensus has changed.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com