Tumblr’s First Year Without Porn
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
I had used it as a scrap book, there was genuinely interesting art and design content on the site, from illustrators portfolios to photographers work to architecture blogs.
Maybe it’s found it’s place with hyper specific fandoms around tv shows as seems to be what’s suggested logging in again but part of me is sad that something that was genuinely great was squandered.
Pron not seen as an "other" in a medium that didn't go out of it's way to make it othered?
This is exactly the kind of insight that only takes a study when a society is simultaneously marinated in censorship and unwilling to admit any instance of it deserves the label "censorship." It's not like censorship is anything new, or that the mechanisms and ramifications are poorly understood.
As others mentioned, it wasn't the ban of porn that made Tumblr lose a lot of users. It was the heavy-handed nature of the ban plus the fact that the flagging algorithm was -- and still is -- extremely buggy and unreliable. The amount of injustice that many honest content creators suffered there lost Tumblr a user goodwill that spanned back a decade. Tumblr will never regain that.
And I seriously doubt the "20% lost users" number is realistic. I enjoyed the erotic and pornographic content of Tumblr but didn't leave after the hammer hit; however, my engagement with it heavily dropped.
I doubt they included that in their imaginary 20% lost users. Sure, technically maybe only 20% left but I am pretty sure that many like myself just didn't bother uninstalling the app or deleting their account. How convenient that user activity wasn't mentioned in detail in this post.
They can say whatever they like. Of course they will downplay any negatives, it's their job. But Tumblr is pretty much dead in the water (read: irrelevant).
Which is a shame because Twitter and Reddit definitely don't deserve the extra active users they gained from the exodus.
Source?
Last I checked, they were serving 2.37 BILLION M.A.U.s.
...That's literally like 30% of the world population. If you exclude babies and under 5, the number is probably more like 40 to 45% of world population.
> Facebook now serves 2.37 billion monthly active users, an increase of 55 million on the previous quarter.
Source: Q1 2019 Earnings Report https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_financials/2019/Q1...
"Duplicate and false accounts are very difficult to measure at our scale, and it is possible that the actual number of duplicate and false accounts may vary significantly from our estimates."