Amazon's on-site emergency care endangers its employees
theintercept.com
theintercept.com
But this isn't isolated just to "on-site clinics." Employers also have a motive to fire employees that are costly on self-funded insurance schemes (even if it is illegal), or to send employees to employer contracted "workers comp clinics" who seemingly exist to protect the employer from liability rather than treatment.
Why is employment and healthcare intermingled at all in the US? It has caused nothing but problems, hurts competition ("free market" where you cannot pick your own insurance provider), hurts people, and adds needless complexity to an already needlessly complex system.
In the WWII era, the federal government handed down strict wage controls. Companies still had to compete with one another for workers, but they couldn't offer to pay more. So companies looked for other things they could offer. Health care, and health insurance, was one such.
In at least one case this wound up taking over the whole business. Kaiser Permanente used to be an aluminum and shipbuilding concern with a sideline in healthcare to provide for its many workers.
Does anyone know why this is the case?
(Not an expert on tax law, so correct me if I’m wrong on this.)
It alleges, among other things, employees' care being delayed to hide the injury from on-site auditors.
Ooof.
BEZOS, YOU HAVE FAILED YOUR PROFESSION!