https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86seb-iZCnI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VogqOscJYvk
With Intel just releasing oneAPI (aka Data Parallel C++) last month, and Khronos pushing SYCL as alternative to CUDA C++.
It took 30 years for C++ to reach this stage, and in some domains (like embedded) it is still fighting for relevance.
That is something to keep in mind whenever to advocate Rust as replacement for Domain XYZ.
Rust has yet to define a memory model.
I also can't find any details on the CUDA project you mention, it seems counter-intuitive to me. At least with graphics data, it's mostly just large buffers of structs, defined with vertex attrib pointers or whatever. What advantages would a more complex memory model yield?
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.04432.pdf
https://people.mpi-sws.org/~viktor/slides/2016-01-debug.pdf
A language memory model is a mathematical specification on how the language semantics map to actual CPUs and the basis how to write lock-free algorithms.
If you bothered to follow the YouTube videos you would found the CUDA projects I mentioned.
Rust currently doesn't have such mathematical model.
Dude, you linked to two hours worth of video. Give people a break.
Just clicking on the links would show the info.
consistency