Surely that happens all the time, though?
I mean, if I brought a car factory in 1950 is it unjust that the government changed the deal by forcing me to start supplying seatbelts in the 1960s?
Surely that happens all the time, though?
I mean, if I brought a car factory in 1950 is it unjust that the government changed the deal by forcing me to start supplying seatbelts in the 1960s?
In this case, a California court of appeals found that there was no "public trust" right to access the beach years ago. So what did the state do? It pursued a frivolous theory based on the idea that just because someone has been operating a public beach, they and all their successors must keep operating a public beach. That's not a law of general application "requiring everyone to put seatbelts in cars." That's abuse targeting a single individual and his property.
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Academic/Metarules/Metarules.h...
It discusses some of the problems with both horns of the dilemma about changing rules.