Reverse Engineering for Beginners [pdf]

Maybe you can make the "hex editor", "debugger" and "disassembler" bold words into links to good FOSS implementations of each tool?

Otherwise, this looks very interesting :)

ISA's can get very complex very fast, so I would suggest, like the author wrote down in next sentence, to realize that some complexity is best left for a later time.

Now that I think about it, ISA's/assembly are a really good example of how lots of tiny small things combined can become really hard to understand fast.

Branch delay slots on MIPS come about because the instruction decoder already has the next instruction ready by the time the conditional runs. The architecture decides to unconditionally run this instruction instead of potentially throwing it away due to the results of the branch.

Branch delay slot gives you something to do while you're not sure where you're going. In the best case, you don't take the branch, and you have made progress down the correct path without knowing that it was the correct path. However, it's not always possible to fill the branch delay slot with useful instructions, so a lot of the time it ends up just being a nop.

Lena151's tutorials were how I got into RE back when I was yet to install WinXP SP1.

The Lena151 tutorials will only teach dynamic analysis, not static analysis. What most people do in industry is a combination of static and dynamic analysis. Static analysis being used to figure out the overall structure and function of a binary, and dynamic analysis being used to fill in details that would otherwise be tedious to figure out with a pure static approach.

LiveOverflow's channel on YouTube has been fantastic and may be slightly more up to date.

I've followed this book for a bit when learning. Most of it is just examples however. You basically write the program in c, compile and assemble it, disassemble it, and see what it looks like. It's a good exercise though and repeating the motions help. After following it a bit you can then pick ones which you find more interesting. Also I didn't follow it all the way through, the content later in might be a bit different

The book is good and it explains stuff very well. It can be a bit dense in the beginning, if you're looking for a gentler introduction look at the Lena151 tutorials I linked to elsewhere in this thread.

Ultimately reverse engineering is a hard and dry topic to learn. Different people learn in different ways. Try several different tutorials and learning resources before finding what works for you.

Reverse engineering has been invaluable for my career. It helps you understand the intricacies of modern systems, and makes it so you're never afraid to dive under the hood of something. You approach all software with a can-do attitude, because you know that no matter what, with enough effort you will be able to understand it and make it do what you want.

It has also opened up many interesting career paths for me in game anticheat, software exploitation, and tamper resistance. The jobs pay well and are very interesting :)

I'm one "in the know", so I'll answer that part.

Heck yeah it is valuable. My area has numerous employers that are eager to hire people with that skill set. It pays more than the typical software development jobs. Most of the jobs seem to be related to how things get hacked into. One can play defense or offense.

I post about my employer in the "Who is hiring?" sometimes: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21422735

A dedicated career in reverse engineering is quite lucrative.

It is also quite helpful in the embedded space where sometimes your only tool is a hex dump of memory.

The parts I read seemed well-written, but I'm not sure any beginners are going to dive into a big tome like this.

I started reversing when I started coding, which was back in the 80s. Back then it was just trying to get extra lives on home computer-games.

Later I wanted to install software, and that lead me to +fravia, and some of the associated challenges.

It's almost too hard to step back and imagine whether a true beginner would follow along, but I think with the right motivation and a lot of baby-steps along the way it is a field that will always draw some people, and they'll get there in the end due to sheer tenacity, regardless of the quality of documentation they come across.

Ackshually, all matter emits black body radiation and is therefore on the spectrum. /s

beginners to reverse engineering, nothing otherwise implied

Found the web developer

This book is great. I would say that it is for beginners as long as they have some semblance of C understanding and spent a few hours (days?) reading up about assembly and machine code topics. These skills take years to truly master and the book starts from the beginning. I think the difficulty of asm is overrated (its not uncommon for young kids to learn this sort of stuff).

I think one of the greatest initial hurdles of being a good reverser is not being afraid to wade through large amounts of disassembly and being comfortable with not understanding whats going on for long periods of time.

Glancing at the table of contents, it seems like it covers an excellent breadth of useful topic for reverse engineers/hackers/those interested in how their computer works. One part of that will be a working knowledge of assembly, of course, so that’s why the book tries to give a somewhat fast-paced intro to it. But you’ll see that there are other things covered too.

Please don't use that as an insult.

Shouldn't we be kinda proud of it?

It can be a quite lengthy introduction and still be intended for begginers.

I don't see the contradiction.

Unfortunatly the french translation is very bad and hardly readable.