https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/02/08/a-closer-lo...
The idea that they are at particular risk from random people with weapons is not supported by statistics.
The current level of violence pretty clearly (to me) justifies police having access to weapons. It doesn't justify using them quickly.
This may be true (I don't know), however one thing is the risk and the perceived risk, and as humans, they're different.
The problem of law enforcement killing people also has little to do with gun ownership. The frequent (or at least frequent enough to be concerning) shootings of unarmed black men for example are generally excused with police officers saying they were "afraid for their lives". This can only either be explained with terrible training or plain old racism (i.e. black men seem more threatening by default to the extent that an unarmed black man is considered more threatening than an armed white man), or most likely a mixture of both.
There's a lot wrong with how police in the US is trained and held accountable. Gun ownership is the smallest contributor to that problem.
Police officers only ever say that to lay the groundwork for a legal self-defense argument.
>Gun ownership is the smallest contributor to that problem
On the one hand, maybe, but on the other hand, it's difficult to stab someone from a distance, so the effect of guns as a force multiplier is relevant.
Or on the other hand, being afraid for your life is one of the motivators for resorting to deadly force.
> On the one hand, maybe, but on the other hand, it's difficult to stab someone from a distance, so the effect of guns as a force multiplier is relevant.
It's a good thing that human beings are not equipped with appendages on their lower body that enable locomotion.