Google needs a "block this domain from my search results"-- they even had it, for a brief period of a few months a number of years ago. (maybe only for some users?)
Google needs a "block this domain from my search results"-- they even had it, for a brief period of a few months a number of years ago. (maybe only for some users?)
[Edit: credit the author of the script]
1. top 10 X near you August 2019
2. top 10 X near you July 2019
3. top 10 X near you June 2019
etc.
They're just taking the top 10 reviewed places on yelp that may or may not serve that food item and then publishing these monthly "posts" to be indexed. If I wanted to look on yelp I would search yelp!
Which is what I see anytime I am trying to lookup ideas for some niche restaurant genre.
Sushi in Singapore (thehoneycombers.net)
9 BEST Places To Get Affordable Sushi In Singapore UNDER ... (thefinder.com.sg)
Sushi (wikipedia.org)
Best Sushi in Singapore, 2019 (burpple.com)
The 11 Best Affordable Sushi Bars in Singapore (timeout.com)
The Best Singapore Sushi (tripadvisor.com.sg)
On DDG: Sakae (sakaesushi.com.sg)
Sushi (wikipedia.org)
Sushi Tei (sushitei.com)
Umisushi (umisushi.com.sg)
Sushi (japan-guide.com)
Sushi Recipes (sushirecipies.org)
The Different Kinds of Sushi (delishably.com)
Google displays the spammy list articles you mentioned, while DDG generally lists Sushi chains.I think I prefer the DDG results, but I guess that depends on the quality of the list links that Google provided. I guess the differences can be explained by Google being much more targeted by SEO tricks.
Quora and Pinterest are particularly routine spam sites in my search results.
They rank just below word reference site spam, like dictionaries, thesauruses, or translation dictionaries (sites which I do benefit occasionally from), and below Wikipedia mirrors (which I feel has become so bad that I can't even get legitimate results talking about the problem itself! Try searching something like: search results spam wikipedia mirror "revolvy" "wikiwand").
But for me, the worst (and most obvious!) offenders by far are "pronunciation guide" spam sites. Just a few examples:
howtopronounce.com
howtopronounce.co.in
pronouncekiwi.com
pronouncenames.com
pronunciationof.com
rightpronunciation.com
plus the scourge of 16-second YouTube videos on channels with names like Pronunciation Guide or Emma Saying.(If you search for something like "Deidesheimer pronunciation" or "pronounce Canynge" on Google, the vast majority of results will be those spam sites, plus maybe an ancient forum thread from 2004 that veered off topic before anyone even tried to give a serious yet uninformed answer.)
These ad-infested spam sites purport to teach you how to pronounce an unfamiliar name or tricky word (an important and underappreciated service that many people use!). But usually they merely contain computer-generated bullshit, as if fed directly into all available text-to-speech algorithms. Even the ostensibly human-generated recordings and sites are often flagrantly wrong, unsourced, and untrustworthy.
There are a few legitimate sites (such as Forvo, Youglish, etc.), but too often they are woefully incomplete (by nature of their being crowdsourced). Forvo even contributes to the spam with "do you know how to pronounce this word?" false positives.
I once blocked all of the spam sites when the domain-blocking feature you mentioned was built into Google Search; then had to do it once again when I needed a browser add-on to replace the removed feature (which naturally only worked on desktop); and recently I was astonished to find that the add-on also stopped working! The spam never ends.
One might argue that the SEO garbage here is less bad, since there really isn't any alternative site they're stealing hits from, but it's still a sign that shows just how horrible the web has become.
`-site:quora.com`
done! (mostly)