Peter Schiff: "In many ways, it's going to be worse than the Depression."
myprops.org
myprops.org
I always pick up some books every time someone is giving them away for free. One of my favourites (which I unfortunately left in my old office) is called something like "The Great Depression of the 1990s" (publication date: 1989) and warns us all how terrible the 1990s are going to be.
People coming in from reddit? Those kinds of stories are tremendously popular there. "Doom! Gloom!" sells, I guess.
Perhaps economically literate people who agree with the arguments? Schiff is a little on the alarmist side, but it takes a megaphone to be heard over the geyser of bull-tard propaganda that dominates popular business discussion. You get ahead in America by joining the rah-rah chorus and people just don't want to hear bad news.
> Everybody Panic articles.
Schiff is very positive and bullish on certain countries and certain sectors. "Everybody panic" is not his theme; it's "US citizens should panic." If you paid attention to him six years ago and panicked, and moved out of USD denominated assets you're something like 50% richer than your neighbors. So who's being irrational?
> "The Great Depression of the 1990s"
What's your point? Various idiots make bad predictions all the time? So what? Might as well mention "Dow 30000". Schiff isn't an idiot. His arguments are sound.
... for some odd values of "economically literate", and who haven't caught on that this site is not for the discussion of one's pet economic and political theories.
The production of good as the basis for an economy is dead. His argument is ignorant.
This is not an economic forum. Please post elsewhere.
Do yourself a favor, and read up about it before you dismiss all of that as pointless doom and gloom. Ultimately it all comes down to the mindset change that has happened in America (and many other countries) over the past 15-20 years. Debt has become very fashionable, and large segments of the population have unwittingly become debt slaves. The ultimate root cause is Federal Reserve monetary policy (find out why).
Credit bubbles do not end well.
The Fed is trying to get more money out into the economy but debt is eating it up before it can do any good. Now they are going to try raising interest rates to get more outside investment but were messed up by the EU also announcing there own interest rates may rise.
People point out other drawbacks of the free banking and classical gold standard eras, and I agree that the systems had their problems. However, they were also working with a much smaller and less technological economy. In addition, they were hampered with idiotic anti-banking laws (such as unitary branching), most of which have been repealed today.
I don't think we need a price-setter on the short term credit markets, and I don't think we need legal monopoly money. I don't think the arguments for the market break down in the monetary sphere.
Anti-Fed people might not always state their case well, but that doesn't mean there is not a good case. There are a few Nobel's among the gold bugs.
That doesn't, by the way, mean that we aren't in for a rough few years (although depression-era hunger lines seem a step or nine too far to me). It just means that this guy doesn't statistically know any better than we do. He was just lucky.
Stop posting this crap, please. :-)