Kurt Vonnegut Museum Opens in Indianapolis
economist.com
economist.com
I became a Vonnegut fan at age 12 when I tried to check out Breakfast of Champions from the local library, and they sent me home with a permission slip for my mom to sign instead. So of course I had to read all of his books. Then had to reread them a few years later to understand them.
"A purpose of human life, no matter who is controlling it, is to love whoever is around to be loved." -- Vonnegut
It does seem like that sometimes. I think generally things have been going in the right direction overall (mostly), but some people are never satisfied and use social media to loudly demand that everything in society to be structured in exactly the way that pleases them, and not make any attempts to adapt themselves to society.
But if that never happened, and everyone was quiet, we wouldn't have the positive overall changes our world enjoys, it's just sad to see some people that look like they don't want to even try to enjoy the life they're given.
[0]: https://www2.ljworld.com/news/2005/may/05/vonnegut_lawyers_c...
Diana Moon Glampers demonstrated a competent executive branch of government.
Reality is not so kind.
(If you want to know who Diana Moon Glampers is ... Go read "Harrison Bergeron".)
Can you expand on this? Isn't a central part of that book radical equalisation, where today's world is full of people and institutions driving inequality to greater heights.
In the story talented people are forced to handicap themselves. What is the parallel of that to the real world?
In short, it goes beyond merely being unbelievable; it gleefully throws the whole notion of believability into a dumpster and sets it on fire because the fire is pretty.
This is a Gaelic proverb at least a couple hundred years older than either of these people.
I do enjoy reading his books, even as not much of a fiction reader.
His essays in "a Man without a country". particularly the "shape of stories", where he visualizes plots on a graph.
The Gervais Principle is another saga of his worth reading in its entirety (much better than just finding a summary of it somewhere).
Small, quaint place. Definitely worth stopping by.
[1] https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kurt-vonnegut-board-game_n_21...
And someone on BoardGameGeek[1] says:
> A few years ago, after hearing about Mr. Vonnegut's GHQ game, I attempted to get access to the appropriate boxes at the Indiana Library. Failing that, I tried to persuade a fellow wargamer who lived closer to Bloomington than I did to go and have a peek for me. And failing that, I applied to the library for photocopies of the essential documents.
> This was all in aid of an article for Simulacrum.
> The library advised me that they could not photocopy any information from Mr. Vonnegut's files without the approval of his lawyer-cum-copyright holder/protector. So I contacted the lawyer, who wasn't aware that the files contained a game designed by Mr. Vonnegut. Then I never heard from him again.
> So I abandoned the effort to get, if nothing else, a copy of the rules. Perhaps someone here who is near the library could stop by and check it out.
> John Kula
And later:
> John Kula's enquiry got as far as the librarian at the Lilly Library at IU. She pulled the folder and said that it contained about "100 pages of different documents about the game, including multiple drafts of the game instructions, letters and notes about the game, etc.". So it appears that Vonnegut did do a bit of thinking and testing of the game, for sure.
Someone also mentions that an "interpretation" of the rules is available at generalheadquartersgame.com, but that URL is gone and even archive.org doesn't seem to have a single copy of it. It's also unclear what exactly that "interpretation" was based off anyway.
[1] https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/883385/kurt-vonneguts-board...
A friend recommended Catcher in the Rye, but it didn't appeal to me, so he suggested Cat's Cradle.
After that I went on a binge.
I know Slaughterhouse-5 gets all the accolades, but for me Breakfast of Champions is my all time favorite novel.
Timequake was OK as a for-the-fans kind of thing I guess, but not great. Bluebeard is already a kind of summing-up of Vonnegut's major themes and is quite a bit better, so Timequake's just... fine. Slapstick is more memorable than Jailbird and Hocus Pocus but only for how incredibly bad it is.
I like or love all the other (counts) eight novels.
(Doesn't help that I'm also in that team of people with a strange disjoint out-of-time relationship to Vonnegut's novels having read Breakfast of Champions to early to understand most of it, and wandered the rest of the catalog randomly via my parents library and then the actual library as I grew older. Timequake was the only one released in a time where I was able to anticipate it, and given opportunity to hype it so much in my own head.)
Rented a tent a tent a tent
I thought it was about Kurt Russel, the famous Snake Plissken.
But at least I know action movies.