Once Popular, Car Pools Go the Way of Hitchhiking
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Incentivized by time and cost savings, carpooling could be extremely successful. What has failed are the centrally organized carpooling systems operated by governments. And the startups that I've seen that aim to facilitate carpooling have all sucked. I'm certain that carpooling would be more successful here if there were more carpool lanes, like on the hwy 580 and 24 approaches to the Bay Bridge and more carpool lanes in the reverse direction (right now, it's only hwy 80).
While I take mass transit (Muni and BART) on a regular basis, mass transit can't be the only alternative to driving alone. These transit systems are often hamstrung by poor management and drain a lot of tax dollars.
Calling carpooling a crutch and failed urban planning (other comments here) is inaccurate. As a country we pour billions of dollars into bridges, tunnels and highways to keep up with the demand of single occupant cars during commute hours. The lost productivity and the pollution and petroleum dependency growth is an enormous burden on the country. That's a dramatically larger failing than carpooling.
Rather than continuing to dump resources into a failed experiment (i.e. carpooling), urban planners should be working to increase the availability of mass transit.
I've had to use mass transit before, in my poor student days. Misery. Standing at rainy bus stops hoping the bus might come, half-hour connections, taking 2-3 hours out of my day for a 15-minute trip each way.
Slight head scratcher.