Among other things, one would certainly have to exclude any country which engages in the mass collection and permanent storage of all of its citizens' communications.

One that doesn't suspend all freedoms and human rights when the magical word "terrorism" is invoked.

Maybe I wouldn't?

Have you ever stopped to think that there is no such thing as free?

I like ones with full suffrage for all citizens of age of majority, including criminals. Like Canada.

You used the term first, so probably you should define it, and then you can explain why it's "questionable" for threat of prosecution to ever be considered torture in such a place, and then you can explain why the country threatening to prosecute Assange meets that definition.