Fedex isn’t just challenging the facts. They are challenging the underlying premise that corporations are a net negative on society.
I think it would be fascinating to see an actual debate by folks that aren’t politicians, but are willing to put their public reputation on the line.
Actually, they didn't say anything that challenges a single specific fact from the article.
> They are challenging the underlying premise that corporations are a net negative on society.
The article never made that claim (nor even implied it).
What Fedex is doing is attempting to change the discussion from a very specific accusation to, well, anything other than what the specific accusation were. I can't believe otherwise intelligent people fall for this nonsense.
But they are also challenging the facts, and then refusing to state what facts are incorrect.
For example, the Wakefield study that led to an entire anti-vaccination movement.