You don't see it because it's not there.
People make these leaps of fiction on their own from usually well meaning but confused stances.
People make these leaps of fiction on their own from usually well meaning but confused stances.
>Extraversion expressed as gregariousness rather than assertiveness. Also, higher agreeableness. This leads to women generally having a harder time negotiating salary, asking for raises, speaking up, and leading.
Do you see it? The part where he says women are genetically worse leaders, and have worse salaries because they're genetically worse negotiators? Remember, the section is titled "Possible non-bias causes of the gender gap in tech", implying that women are paid less because it's natural, not because of sexist bias.
At any rate, I appreciate the patronizing "making well meaning but confused leaps of logic" pat in the head.
Yes, your are making an unsubstantiated leap from what was actually written to claiming that Damore write that his female coworkers should be paid less than men for the same work.
Statistics are all we have to go on in this regard, and they are in Damore's favor.
The truth is not bigoted.
"White men can't jump" is generally true.
Personality traits are like most things on a spectrum, and women tend to have less of the traits which have until now been perceived to be necessary for "negotiating salary, asking for raises, speaking up, and leading"
There are leaders that are women, see AMD.