I think the only real drawback is no self hosting.
A pretty healthy example:
https://observablehq.com/@rreusser/2d-n-body-gravity-with-po...
I think the only real drawback is no self hosting.
A pretty healthy example:
https://observablehq.com/@rreusser/2d-n-body-gravity-with-po...
I haven’t gotten properly stuck into observable - in what ways is it better than using a jupyter notebook?
But yeah I'd have to agree that Bostock is a beast.
The Jupyter documentation includes an example for importing other notebooks here: https://jupyter-notebook.readthedocs.io/en/stable/examples/N...
Observable does some things quite well for that use case:
-- Easier dependencies: no need for 'npm install', just 'require(...)'
-- URL publishing
-- Collaborative merge flow
However, Jupyter made some good decisions that make it win over Observable for our day-to-day data work:
-- Manual reexecution vs. automatic: when working with big data, outside APIs, etc., Observable's automatic reexecution is a non-starter
-- Fully open source, embeddable, and successful history of non-vc funding: Jupyter is organized and provided in a way companies ( who aren't Amazon ;-)) can rally around, evidenced by contributions by Bloomberg etc.
-- Access to underlying unix/windows env and multiple environments (multiple Python versions, ...). As much as I wish Observable's choice of JS could provide a viable data environment, and I've personally invested in making it so and the path to making it first-class is clear, we need way more gov/google/nvidia/etc. support.
Ultimately, for not-too-sensitive collaborative data work, we use Google Colab, then offline and sensitive commercial work via Jupyter (Graphistry ships with it preloaded for GPU dataframe & GPU visual graph analytics goodness!), and if we did more in JS tutorial land, Observable would be my first choice.
Yeah automatic re-execution sounds like a weird design choice. Think I'll stick with Jupyter notebooks for now...
while you're browsing: this is equally great :)
https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013...
Especially crazy that these work as well and quickly on mobile!
The (reactive JavaScript) Observable runtime is open source, and every notebook is available compiled as an ES Module.
You can embed notebooks in their entirety on any webpage, or just grab the embed code for an individual cell, if the notebook produces a single visualization.
For the details in all their nitty gritty, see: https://observablehq.com/@observablehq/downloading-and-embed...
A comment from May last year [1] says "But that won’t include the editable notebook interface or the rest of observablehq.com - unlike Jupyter, we’re really aiming to create a community and cross-pollination of concepts and code rather than individual installations. We might eventually launch something that enables offline editing, but that’s a bit further out in the future."
[1] https://talk.observablehq.com/t/noob-can-you-run-your-own-ob...
> Polynote is an experimental polyglot notebook environment. Currently, it supports Scala and Python (with or without Spark), SQL, and Vega.
It supports javascript and typescript relatively new but capable.