It's a game of cat and mouse.
At the end of the day, everything with sensors is an arms race. We've actually seen this evolution before with the early spinning mirror IR missiles and those glass disco balls on helicopters.
Set up a bunch of not-quite-parallel tubes with simple and durable light-sensors in the "deep" end, and whichever sensor measures the highest must be pointed at the light-source.
> So you want your lens covered 99.9% of the time, just in case someone points a laser at it?
Don't some missile seekers already work that way?
https://www.ausairpower.net/TE-Sidewinder-94.html:
> The Sidewinder's seeker used an ingeniously clever optical arrangement, with a Cassegrainian mirror fitted with a tilted secondary mirror. The secondary mirror rotated in unison with a reticle, projecting the whole instantaneous field of view of the mirror through the reticle onto a filter/detector assembly. Because the mirror secondary was tilted, rotating it about the missile's axis swept the cone of the mirror's field of view about the missile's axis in a fashion analogous to a conical scanning radar seeker (see diagram).