UX Poll - Users Want Speed over Social Features | Hacker News Reader

UX Poll - Users Want Speed over Social Features

uxmovement.com

17 pointstrustfundbaby13 comments

These results are not very actionable.

First, 148 responses is largely inadequate, especially considering the sheer number of possible choices. 148/10 = 14.8 votes, on average, per choice. Hardly accurate enough to make a reasonable judgement.

Second, the responses are unquestionably biased. To my knowledge, the poll was hosted only on UX Movement. More likely than not, respondents were voting based upon what they believe to be "best practices," as opposed to true desires: "I recently revamped a website to include fewer screens, and people seemed to like it."

So, let me clarify. These results aren't actionable unless you're building for UX enthusiasts, which, given the pie chart displayed, UX Movement is not.

Surprisingly, the social media functions we suggested did not rank as well. Although Facebook and Twitter are wildly popular with consumers, respondents didn’t seem too concerned with incorporating these UI paradigms into their business apps. We suspect this will change over time.

I hate to break it to the people that wrote this, but just because social media is useful to consumers doesn't mean it's useful for businesses.

The emphasis should be on "Business users want their UIs to be easier to navigate and more responsive? How can we make that happen?" Instead, it seems to be "Business users want their UIs to be easier to navigate and more responsive but don't want social features? They're just behind the times. They want social features. They just don't know it." This is a classic case of putting the horse before the cart.

"We received 148 responses before we closed the poll." This doesn't seem like a good sample size.

Not only that, the pie chart (http://www.softwareadvice.com/articles/wp-content/uploads/20...) is such a disgrace to design in general I have to question if these people actually have eyes or not.

Maybe that's a plus. It might not be as accessible to the rest of us, but I guarantee you their sites would be plenty accessible to the blind.

This pie chart is illegible (four shades of gray?). A bar chart would have been much better.

I feel like companies are over using social features in products. Sometimes it's a nice addition, but most of the time it's just a distraction from what your product actually does.

The best product is one that assists you in completing a certain task painlessly and quickly. Socializing is a time waster.

On top of that, if you're going to socialize, which product will you do it on? (insert product name here) or Facebook?

This is a bit off topic, but what's a better way to represent fractional data than a pie chart? I'd say bar chart, but that doesn't immediately show that the data sums to 1.

While a pie chart may be the best way to represent fractional data, a pie chart with 10 segments and four shades of grey is not. A better method would have been to include only significant results, coupled with an "Other" category, in the chart. A separate data table could then inform those interested in delving deeper into the results.

Well, pie charts aren't a very good way to represent fractional data because humans aren't great at judging angles.

... "for business applications". (and according to a low sample rate). No insights to glean here, in my opinion.

Random people voting for what would be a good feature in nonexistent business apps? A very useful survey...

Actually, "random" people would be better than the biased voters it currently has.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com