Academic Ranking of World's Universities in Computer Science | Hacker News Reader

Academic Ranking of World's Universities in Computer Science

arwu.org

20 pointskenjackson17 comments

Warning: do not use this ranking to decide which schools to apply to. 75% of the criteria weight appears to be based on absolute figures (total number of papers, total number of Turing Awards etc.). If you'd prefer a school where 4 out of 15 profs have Turing Awards to one with 5 out of 150, this is not the right ranking to be looking at.

I totally agree. It's such a piss poor way to rank universities I can't believe they published it. The data isn't even really complete so there are a bunch of universities (like the University of Waterloo) in the 76-100 ranking that should be in the top 30 that aren't because they haven't bothered to do all of their homework.

Especially since those Turing laureates aren't going teach most of the undergrad classes.

This has to be a joke.

"Institutions are ranked in five subject fields, including Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, Computer Sciences and Economics/Business."

You're seriously telling me that - for example - just one university in Germany can't even crack the top 50? That's a joke.

Perhaps it may be that European education is less focused on prestige of universities and funneling funding to those specific uni's. Therefore the talent is spread out much more. Just speculation.

Disclaimer - I'm American.

Your analysis is very accurate. In most of western Europe university quality tends to be much more uniform than in US. I think many people choose a Uni based on other criteria: livable city, near/far from parents/partner, etc. There have been attempts in past 10 years to create "elite" hubs, but it goes against the main currents here.

The UK only has five: Oxbridge, Manchester, Edinburgh and Bristol. That said, for the size of the UK compared to US/China I guess it isn't too bad. I still feel the UK performed poorly. But from what I can tell of other European countries, the analysis is correct.

It's another question to ask whether it's better to have a higher baseline of knowledge in a subject, or to have a group far, far above the rest. As most European countries are social democratic in orientation (the UK less so) I would guess the former is preferred.

Kaist and Yonsei are here but Seoul National and Postech aren't? Fail.

My alma mater, RIT isn't even on the list at all. Not because it ranked poorly, because they didn't even include it. Incomplete list is incomplete.

Same here. My alma mater, Stevens Institue of Technology, isn't listed on the site anywhere and it's a pure engineering and science school.

My altma mater, DeVry University, wasn't listed either, but that's because DeVry sucks.

This data is basically complete crap. Most academic rankings are borderline useless, but this appears worse than average.

To the Italians: University of Calabria? Higher than, say, Milan, Rome, Pisa? There's something seriously wrong about this ranking

The problem with these sorts of calculations is that people are much more likely to cite research done by people they know, people in their own country and works in a language they understand. So it ends up skewed in the favour of english speaking countries and countries with large numbers of computer scientists.

Shouldn't there be some Indian schools on here?

What about a ranking that evaluates the universities' ability to produce effective workers?

Regardless of the validity of the data, I am proud to have graduated from #38! OH

I got #16 on this unscientific ranking, take that!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com