p.s., There’s a difference in reducing loopholes and having absolutely zero loopholes (something that may be impossible)
p.s., There’s a difference in reducing loopholes and having absolutely zero loopholes (something that may be impossible)
If the solution is that those people should try to remove those loopholes from the definition of income and there is nothing beyond that to explain how those people should do that then it is a vacuous solution.
p.s, There’s a difference in reducing loopholes and having absolutely zero loopholes (something that may be impossible)
Obviosuly.
You’re basically arguing that I shouldn’t make this statement unless I have specific details about how to simplify taxes? I can’t make a general directional statement if I haven’t taken the time to learn about all the nuances? Do you always learn about all the nuances and define all the terms before starting a discussion?