Ants trapped for years in an old bunker
jhr.pensoft.net
jhr.pensoft.net
> Of the corpses collected from ‘cemeteries’, a vast majority (93%) bore traces of bites, and also fret holes were seen on their abdomens – typical signs left when the contents have been consumed.
This species is also known to eat their dead in other circumstances:
> It is known that wood ants consume dead bodies of their conspecifics left in masses on the ground during spectacular ‘ant wars’ early in the season.
> Based on the article it seems that they're just endlessly maintaining their nest. Waiting for their Queen who will never come...
I found this to be both extremely hilarious and depressing
Like that sounds much less depressing to me. Or think about it like Spartants. Most ants do not live very long lives in any case.
> "no queen to mate with"
Ant males would never mate in a dirty bunker when there is the entire sky for this kind of romantic bussiness
This is anecdotal, but a WW2 bomb shelter I saw was filled with beetles and other creepy crawlies in Scotland. Ok it probably wasn't as deep underground as a nuclear storage facility but life finds a way.
Meanwhile a cube of side 1 mm has a volume of 1 mm^3.
Given that ants make 20% of the entire animal biomass on land (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_e0CA_nhaE), it didn't cross my mind that subspecies could go to extinction ^^
"Is there anything to eat? I'm so hungry I could eat a horsefly"
"That depends on how long we have to chase you around for"
(1) How did the incoming worker ants come to be in the bunker? Based on the premise, they fell into the bunker already dead. If that's the case and if the ants were not reproducing, unless they have a relatively long lifespan, (2) shouldn't they die out overtime regardless of how many corpses fell into the bunker?
(3) Why couldn't the trap ants make it across the ceiling into the ventilation pipe--are some ants unable to crawl upside down or did the texture of the ceiling impede them?
If the premise is incorrect and the ants have a short lifespan, it's reasonable to think that the "trapped" ants are just an accumulation of worker ants that kept falling into the bunker.
From the abstract:
> Here we show that the ‘colony’ in the bunker survived and grew thanks to an influx of workers from the source nest above the bunker
And the introduction:
> Ants which had dropped through the pipe to the bunker were not able to reach the outlet, located in the ceiling, to return to the mother nest.
And regarding your question about being able to crawl across the ceiling, probably not enough texture to grip. After all, the article indicates that there was question about whether they would even be able to crawl up the ventilation pipe:
> the only way to free the ants from the bunker would be to enable their spontaneous return migration to the maternal nest through the ventilation pipe – assuming that the rusty pipe interior is coarse enough for that
And to your point
> it's reasonable to think that the "trapped" ants are just an accumulation of worker ants that kept falling into the bunker.
Yes, and that is the premise of the study. However, a million ants didn't fall down all at once (or in a very short period), so however long they were down there they had to adapt to survive - which is what the study is about.