> At least with governments you get a representative.
At least with corporations you get a choice, short of emigrating. Google is one of the most dominant corporations in the world, yet there are multiple alternatives to most of their services.
At least with corporations you get a choice, short of emigrating. Google is one of the most dominant corporations in the world, yet there are multiple alternatives to most of their services.
Some states don't even have charter schools, can you believe that?? They only have one choice for schooling from grade K-12
This is complete BS. Private schools have always existed, and still do. On top of that, homeschooling is legal.
That wouldn't be paying for it twice... it would be paying for it like 1.1 times because of the large number of house holds that have no children in public school and still pay taxes.
:)
Case in point: 300 people killed by Boeing and 100 people dead in the fire in Grenfell tower in UK.
On the contrary, a representative might amend/revere the situation, for example by changing the law.
How do we make it an apples to apples comparison? For example,today, 2 million people a year die from air pollution, who is to blame for those deaths?
What about drug cartels, do we count the deaths that occurred in fighting them 'against' government? But if the government did not exist, those deaths would be higher, so do we count 'prevented deaths'? What about tabacco, etc. I dont think a realistic tally can be made.