‘Silicon Valley,’ S6E2 – a billion dollars to violate your principles
padailypost.com
padailypost.com
Money only goes so far, and beyond a certain point it just doesn't matter if you make a little more. I'd rather keep my dignity and contribute positively to the world.
It's sort of like finding honesty in politics. The reason politicians are dishonest is because it works.
It's just a bug in society, I guess.
It's a nice bug. If enough people were guilty of having that mindset, maybe those nice things could make sense?
Obviously this is a wildly simplistic generalization, but it is a very powerful rule of thumb.
The only sensible inner practice I've found is refinement of character. It works both when practiced publicly and when practiced privately.
And aspects of character can be built, sustained and recycled. Like anything.
Now I'm not rolling in cash as a result, but I'm quite comfortable. And I ended up much better than some of the cut throat people involved in that enterprise who lost the game of thrones and ended up with nothing.
"Good enough" has been a highly rewarding concept for me.
It's a lack of exchange caused by lack of specificity of requests and a lack of discernment on the part of the hubs.
I get what you mean by "bug", but I think it's less of a bug, and more of just how things work, and if we could have perfect information, it'd most likely all make sense.
At the end of the day, all of us are gonna have to choose our poison, because none of us are getting out of here alive. I think most people make the very reasonable choice to not end up in a situation where the past will come back to haunt them, since when it does come back it will be very difficult to control the how/when/where of it all.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_%26_Melinda_Gates_Foundat... ... And that's just barely scratching the surface. Honest curiosity will lead you to understanding how the megalomaniac in Bill is still alive and well.
> Honest curiosity will lead you to understanding how the megalomaniac in Bill is still alive and well.
I'll bite. Where is your evidence of Bill Gates being an egomaniac in recent history? The 3 points made in your link are underwhelming.
https://www.gatesnotes.com/Development/Heroes-in-the-Field-Nandan-Nilekani
Reality: https://jsis.washington.edu/news/the-aadhaar-card-cybersecurity-issues-with-indias-biometric-experiment/
https://www.epw.in/engage/article/aadhaar-failures-food-services-welfare
And in general - https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=Aadhaar+problems
The basic underlying idea being pushing surveillance tech under the guise of public welfare.Gates on Climate change:
https://www.gatesnotes.com/Search?search=climate
Reality: https://grist.org/climate-energy/the-gates-foundations-hypocritical-investments/
Gates on medical assistance: https://www.gatesnotes.com/Search?search=medication
Reality: https://www.pambazuka.org/governance/another-missionary-africa-bill-gates-myth
https://www.vox.com/2015/6/10/8760199/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/gates-foundation-accused-of-dangerously-skewing-aid-priorities-by-promoting-big-business-a6822036.html
https://www.nonprofitpro.com/article/report-slams-gates-foundation-for-self-serving-agenda-corporate-ties/
...and this is just with simple random google searches like 'gates foundation criticism' . There is a rabbit hole you can fall through if you're so inclined but the core idea of a megalomaniac comes through fairly quickly.This is true only insofar as the vocational marketplace promotes skillsets that are highly valuable in-context, but over-all contribute to some very negative externalities.
According to the calculations I've done, my collusion in an environment-destroying military-industrial complex is far from well-enough-compensated to, well, compensate for the damage we've wrought.
Even in a simple dollar-scale, if I earn 1/10th what produce for the company, there's an outsized swath of profit spent against my philanthropic endeavors
We, as individuals, cannot outspend the corporations from whose pockets we're fed. Working for a corp it's two steps back for every one step of charitable spending.
It's the old saying: "give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, teach him to fish..."
Philanthropy will never solve the fundamental problems with our economy.
Coercive economic dependence drives exploitation and disparities.
My wife went back to college in her early thirties. During one class, the grad student was trying to get the class to really question their moral certitude. "Would your loved one cheat on you a million dollars?"
My wife, however, was positive. When pressed, she said "Oh, he's done the math. I have nothing to worry about for less than 5 million. After that, sure, who knows, but until then...".
This was not the answer they expected. The students were horrified and the instructor was confused.
To rephrase your point (and the problem): Money can't buy happiness, but it can provide a lot of security against UNHAPPINESS. Depending on where I'm at, security-wise, different money amounts mean different things. Even if I'm very secure in all my personal needs, offer me a billion dollars and there's a lot of options at the top of Maslov's hierarchy. If I recall the math right, I could give a family $10,000/day, every day, for 216 years. Add in the effects of interest (and offset for inflation), and it's probably an infinite ability.
That's a lot of soul-soothing.
I too have made choices, at far less than the $1billion (or 1 million) level. And....
I'm still torn. I'm glad my current job isn't one I'm ashamed of, but those past jobs provided a lot of security for my wife and I. We have physical and mental health specialists able to attend to our needs.
I will disagree with anyone that says money/security is all that matters, but I can't say the choice is easy or clear.
How high of a road do you think you've really taken? This whole industry is super-connected to some unacceptable atrocities, from plastic pollution to the torture-at-scale perpetrated by the military industrial complex.
You may feel as though your hands are clean, but what about your customers and suppliers? How far down/up the dependency chain are you from materially supporting real suffering?
There are a lot of folks on high horses in this industry, but unless you're dead set against the bulk of it, you're colluding in some really, really nasty–not to mention undignified–exploitation, violence, and depravity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reel_Bad_Arabs
That said, this show once again unintentionally predicted current event relevance with its creative choices:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/03/world/americas/chile-prot...
Using Saudis would have been very much part of their style.
Actually, Shadowrun is an RPG set in a cyberpunk world completely unrelated to D&D and Magic is a card game set in a fantasy universe also completely unrelated to D&D (though Magic and D&D have the same publisher).
Sorry, I just had to say that.
TJ Miller leaving was another huge setback for them, he really was the perfect foil for all of the characters around him.
And then he has some movie ideas: https://www.indiewire.com/2019/03/silicon-valley-ending-mike...
Most* European shows follow an arc and then stop. It helps that there isn't really an overwhelming obsession with reaching for syndication(~100 shows). Not much point either as rewards for non US syndication are tiny fractions of US.
Last season already felt like it had a lot of recycled ideas and Erlich Bachman was notably missing.
Although the character that I didn't expect to have much of an arc, is having a great one. I'm of course talking about Jian Yang! Now I wish he would have his own show. That guy is not only hilarious, but a kind of evil mastermind in the classic SV way, where you wonder how someone so seemingly incompetent could do such things.
The plot I feel is still pretty good, and mostly just a normal parody of what is going on in SV, which makes it hilarious, but I don't know if other people would really get it as much as tech insiders would.
He had a "warehouse of Chinese developers" and would simply throw 10 developers at it working on the exact same thing, and use the best code of the 10. That was his pitch.
Needless to say, I said no.