Bloodhound's 461-mph speed is big but team eyes bigger record ahead
techxplore.com
techxplore.com
This year's campaign is not trying to set any records, but just prove out much of the technology using just the jet engine. Next year, all being well, they'll add the rocket and aim towards 1000 mph.
For those interested in the technology, there's an interesting writeup by Ron Ayers (Bloodhound aerodynamicist) and Andy Green on the stability of transonic and supersonic cars here: https://www.bloodhoundlsr.com/the-stability-of-transonic-and...
Wishing them luck: my sons' names are on the fin!
One of the complications of using the EJ200 is that the engine's own control systems assume the engine is in a Eurofighter. So the car control systems need to pretend to be a Eurofighter, as they can't modify the engine's control systems.
Not trying to be rude, just trying to understand whether the article is reporting anything noteworthy at all (other than that the Bloodhound project exists).
Back in 1997, Thrust SSC had enough power to achieve greater speeds than 763 mph, but proved to be nearly uncontrollable. They learned from those lessons, and Bloodhound not only has more power (or will do when they add the rocket engine), but also benefits from years of CFD research. But funding was difficult, and it's taken well over a decade to get this far. Last year the project went bankrupt, only to be rescued at the last minute by Ian Warhurst. The news is that after so long, and so much development effort, the car is finally on the salt flats and progressively increasing speeds as step by step they validate all the new technologies and also validate the actual behaviour matches the models. The fact that after such a difficult path, they've got this far is noteworthy, and bodes well for a full attempt on the record next year.
They've done a whole lot of educational work with the project to get kids (and adults) excited about engineering, which can only be a good thing.
They are truly more 'aircraft' than 'car', in all respects. (even down to the RAF pilot who "drove" it).
Incidentally the creator of the turbojet engine hails from Coventry also; I would recommend checking out the museum, since it is good one, and British museums are free to enter.
However Coventry is/was an absurdly crime ridden city when I was growing up so I'm not sure I should endorse visiting.
And when you're moving well above take-off speeds anything that makes the body lift will make it do just that. Serious aerodynamic challenges here, which makes the Thrust all the more impressive given the time it was designed. No easy access to CFD back then.
Actually; it looks like this was introduced in June this year:
https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventr...
That's a huge shame as there's not many attractions in Coventry really.
edit: video from inside while driving https://youtu.be/kZQBUt3ST4Q?t=253
https://www.topgear.com/car-news/meet-man-who-saved-1000mph-...