Imagine if Donald Trump recently started making some new claim about an event that happened decades ago. Imagine CNN dug up the only historical records that exist, and they directly contradicted that claim.
Would you be this credulous then?
Would you be this credulous then?
The results are always the same: his die-hard supports believe him, and reality is altered; his opponents point it out and wonder how anyone can think he's not maniacal; and the Republican party sighs and repeats the mantra "you dance with the one that brought you".
Of course it’s difficult to give a general answer, and it’d depend on the details of the case.
Perhaps you have a specific example of where Trump was at the tail-end of systematic discrimination in the beginning of his career?
Pregnancy discrimination, and discrimination against women in particular, has been so insidious and so pervasive for so many years, that the standard for proof has changed accordingly.
Apples and oranges, covered by a veneer of intellectualism and a subtle accusation of partisan bias. It’s pretty transparent trolling to be honest.