There’s a neat Dali painting which sort of abuses these properties to combine two portraits: http://archive.thedali.org/mwebcgi/mweb.exe?request=record;i...
There’s a neat Dali painting which sort of abuses these properties to combine two portraits: http://archive.thedali.org/mwebcgi/mweb.exe?request=record;i...
https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/imag...
I just don't get modern art- anything after the impressionists. I normally make an exception for the surrealists, like Dali, but this one is not in the "exception" group, I think.
You can also save that picture on your device and look at the generated thumbnail. Resizing it makes it a lot more obvious.
I guess that's what the pixelated portrait of Lincoln on the same page is then.
Spatial frequency is often reported in cycles/degree. A cycle is one complete set of transitions (light->dark->light) and a degree is the angular distance (1/360th of a circle; about the size of your thumbnail at arm's length). These units are handy since they don't depend on the thing you're looking at or how far away it is.
Human spatial frequency sensitivity peaks between 1-10 cycles/degree, depending on how old you are, to see Ol' Abe, you ought to be far enough away that your thumbnail covers at least five of the tiles.
Think how frustrating it must be to hear other people say how cool something is, while not being able to see it yourself!