It sounds a bit like the opposite side of the customer acquisition cost versus lifetime value.
Traditionally if you have a high user lifetime value you can spend more money on getting more customers by increasing your marketing spend so your CAC (customer acquisition cost)/LTV (lifetime value) stays at a good level. So you can keep a good growth curve.
In this case when your ltv is negative for each issue because of low quality, or simply too many of them then you make it harder for new issues to come in, which should ideally result in fewer but higher quality reports?
I have a question mark in there because I did not spend a lot of time considering this, but I like the thought.