> Many would double up their notifications sending both a native one and an email. For example, if someone messaged me on LinkedIn, that would trigger a notification in the app, plus an email to let me know.
Obviously, you turned on all notifications! Maybe some people like an email notification, and some like an app-based one. What’s the alternative: deny some people their preference? Surely this only matters if one of the notification methods can’t be disabled?
I can certainly see valid use cases where a user would prefer one over the other. Not sure anyone would prefer all three to be turned on, however, which appears to be similar to what the author opted for.
Personally, I couldn't imagine getting notifications for everything.
I have my emails set up to just display a number on the icon. Some other semi-important apps similarly. But a text message is important - so that goes off. Wife could have a flat tire or need a quick answer (arguably a flat tire on the side of the road justifies a call, but who knows these days).
I guess my main thing is that if my phone goes off in my pocket, I want to make sure I'm pulling it out for, at least what could be, a justifiable reason - and not because someone replied to something that I said on Facebook earlier this morning.
There's an intermediate stage between "no notification" and "urgent notification" -- you can configure notifications from different apps to play different sounds.
And I still wonder why we can't have notifications depending on where the user sees it first. Whenever I turn on wifi on my tablet(once a week or so) I get flooded with dozens of old notifications I already cleared on the PC or phone. YouTube somehow manages to host countless videos with amazing technology in the background but their website and app can't remember which comments I've already seen, and sometimes which language and color scheme I've set manually. It's so uncanny to have such modern technology mixed with bugs and behaviour that I'd only expect from a hobby project.