Hacker News Reader

Comment by ljw1001 | Hacker News Reader

> If you presumably want a European-style healthcare system in America and a job market that doesn't only favor employers...

This doesn't stand up to the least amount of reflection.

There are immigrants in Europe. If you look at European countries individually there is massive immigration between them, as well as immigration from outside. And yet.

The US system favors employers not because of free-market competition between employees (or at least not predominantly so) but because corporations have bought the US government and twist every law to their advantage. Destroying the last vestiges of labor unions was just one small part.

View on HN

This comparison is apples to oranges. Intra-EU immigration is mostly high-skilled labor, and the outside low-skilled migration situation is different from America's. In America, most illegal immigrants work in huge numbers in the service and agricultural industries. In Europe, the most comparable group of people being migrants from Africa and the Middle East, are overwhelmingly unemployed. There's less of a supply shock to labor, but certainly very large costs to the state and its healthcare programs. Many European healthcare systems are more strained than ever.

> Intra-EU immigration is mostly high-skilled labor,

Actually it’s the opposite. In fact it’s an area of concern for the EU as they have not been ale to make highly skilled occupations (lawyers, engineers, etc) as portable as hod carrying.

> Many European healthcare systems are more strained than ever.

Citation? Complaints from my friends in France and Germany are risible to someone who has had to interact with US system.

> There are immigrants in Europe. If you look at European countries individually there is massive immigration between them, as well as immigration from outside. And yet.

And yet in almost no country has the original population almost become a minority, unlike the US. So clearly the cumulative net immigration is greater in the US. And Bernie Sanders (someone who has certainly applied the "least amount of reflection" to this) seems to share the GPs view: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf-k6qOfXz0

The original population of the United States is Native Americans. Is that who you meant when you said "original population"?

Or to put it another way, brown people who speak Spanish, for example, have been in North America just as long as white people who speak English...

Actually, the more I think about it, the more curious I am about who you think the "original population" of the United States is, and why

The original population of the Americas was some ungulates, mice and a few flying animals. Humans have always been an invasive species if you want to go far enough back. Where do you want to stop and start the clock to call it the "original population"?

I feel like you're replying to the wrong comment. Unless you're merely agreeing with the parent comment.

LOL, fair enough but this whole thread has been a bit of a dumpster fire. I'm a bit curious as to why it's on HN. I shouldn't have commented, to be honest. The whole "original population" v. "migrant population" argument has always been a little odd to me, is all, as humans are inherently migratory and invasive. Our tribal natures have always made us warlike, we just have a tendency to do it on larger scales (though WWII was the epitome, seemingly), and this goes back to chimpanzee lineages. I just threw in a jab when I should have walked away =)

Agreed entirely. Best wishes friend - and fellow "just human" :)

> brown people who speak Spanish, for example, have been in North America just as long as white people who speak English...

Actually a century longer! The original European capital of North America was Santa Fe in 1610...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com