Right now we aren't anywhere close to even trying to be on the agreed path towards "not too bad". Not "good" let alone "perfect".
Nothing short of catastrophic events will make people give up on their unsustainable lifestyle.
Nothing short of catastrophic events will make people give up on their unsustainable lifestyle.
If your primary goal is to force people to do something they don't want to do, on principle, call yourself an activist, a freedom-fighter, or a terrorist, I don't care. It's all the same to me.
If your primary goal is the survival of the human race, you shouldn't moralize.
Could you expound on that a bit? The assertion alone doesn't parse.
It makes me wonder about the people doing the moralizing: do they really care to contribute to the solution, or are they grinding their own personal axe about the behavior of others?
Enough. This isn't a Parliament and you don't get a liberum veto.