Comment by 3am | Hacker News Reader

Comment by 3am | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

No! You don't get off so easily - you have publicly recommended an investment strategy that allocates 15% (15%!) to a vehicle that you didn't understand and was completely innappropriate.

"switch your recommendation" ??? This is like suggesting a bank use memcached for transactional data, and when called on it, just casually walking it back and saying that maybe Oracle is more appropriate.

It's fantastic that you are getting involved with planning your finances, but you have a lot to learn before giving advice.

:EDIT - This may seem harsh, but I don't believe you have gone through the pain of giving someone investing advice and having it really substantially costing them. I have, and it's very painful. And it could have been worse for me because in that situation the person was young enough to recover and it wasn't a substantial amount of money. Imagine losing an older, retired person a substantial portion of their nest egg with bad advice and consigning them to a lower standard of living for the rest of their life.

I have been investing my own money in stocks, funds, and to a small extent, options for about a decade. I participate of message boards, read books, and participate in stock picking competitions. I still don't feel qualified to give good financial advice. YMMV.

Come on. We're all adults here. It's not like every Grandpa and Gramma on penny pensions would've taken the advice of Joe Random Blogger.

We need to stop treating investing as if people who aren't professionally on a trading floor are basically handling spent fuel rods while rollerskating naked passed Mt. Vesuvius. It's putting money down on a hunch, however educated or ignorant or risky or safe. There is no sure thing. It's either "slow money" or "gambling". There's n+1 bloggers doling out endless advice on everything from where to buy a home to how to haggle for a car. No one is going to look at one data point and say "you know what? That random-ass person makes sense. I'm cleaning out my accounts right now putting it all on ARMH!"

Also, "I still don't feel qualified to give good financial advice" is a bit disingenuous when you, in just a paragraph above it, said you used to.

In other words, let's not obsess over the very things that Jim Cramer does with panic-button sound effects and sweaty, dancing evangelism on a nightly basis. It's all advice, we're all aware. Take it with a grain of salt, etc.

Going long on a 2x leveraged oil ETF for the long term IS a surefire bet, just a very bad one.

Going long via a normal oil ETF for the long term is still quite questionable.

What the above poster is saying is - you're doing something with real consequences and, by writing about it you could hurt not just yourself but other people too.

Learn from his mistakes and given you are patently insufficiently informed to do this, don't do it. Given all you're trying to do is implement Scott Adams and NNT's advice why not just link to their articles and leave it at that. Why do you feel the need to pontificate to the world about this subject?

I think you have frustrations with people other than me. I manage my own money, and clearly stated that I think it's fantastic that the original poster is managing his own. More people should do it.

I warned against giving financial advice because I had a bad experience doing it. I fail to see how that's disingenuous, consider it trying to help someone else learn from my mistakes. Making mistakes with your own money is fine, making mistakes with someone elses' is an awful feeling that I would just as soon help others avoid. The thing about investing success is that it makes a person cocky and more prone to offer advice at the the worst possible time, when their performance is most likely to regress to the mean.

You are ignoring an important point of mine - that the advice being offered here is terrible. He thought he was going to buy a leveraged oil fund and get double beta, when he was actually buying a day trading tool that tries to offer double beta on a daily basis. It's not the same as buying USO on margin. Anyone that holds UCO over the long term is almost assured of underperformance. That is a fundamental mistake, not nitpicking. And 5% is a larg-ish position in a concentrated porfolio, this was a 15% weighting. Don't get me started on the ARMH selection (well criticized elsewhere) and the age inappropriate / poorly timed 55% bond position.

Finally, it's not like I cherrypicked a random blog to criticize - this person wrote about it and submitted it to HN. I don't have time to police the internet, but this was inviting feedback, and mine is critical.

But that's my point. It wasn't that his advice wasn't wrongheaded or flat ignorant, it was your reaction.

"Oh, No! You have no _right_ to change your mind!" It's a blog post. It has as much legitimacy and authority over marketplaces as the entire CNBC network, i.e. none at all. Time and again, we see people on these so-called business networks doling out terribly wrong advice that, if followed, would cost you dearly, even in the short term (e.g., Jim Cramer's infamous "long on Bear Stearns" rant only a week before it went out of business). Cramer is a guy that's been a hedge fund manager and stock prognosticator for as long as some of us on HN (not me, mind you) have been alive and for some reason is just as stunningly ignorant of future events in the market as a market newbie.

This is the world that we live in now. We'll all just have to accept the fact that there are people who document everything that is going on in their minds, whether it's what they ate for lunch to their forex trading strategy to their insistence on voting for only old white Protestant men. Nothing OP did was immoral or illegal. It was content. Information, no matter how right or wrong, wants to be free. And, you're free to opine on it, and I on yours.

Of course the poster has a right to change his mind. I said I wasn't letting him off the hook so easily. Totally different things, and I agree with you completely on your point while standing by my original one.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com