Most Americans Say Parents Do Too Much for Their Young Adult Children
pewsocialtrends.org
pewsocialtrends.org
This divergence is symptomatic of a broken society. It's easier to divide a bigger pie. The pie was bigger in 1980 and now we are dividing up the crumbs, so it's harder to get enough.
Parents helping their children longer in life is really the only solution. It's basically like, those who achieved financial independence in 1980 did so by taking from future generations, their own children, and are now being chastised for giving some of it back.
It's nonsensical to admonish parents for helping their children overcome the burdens society has placed on future generations by having already taken too much from the planet.
Let's just look at the burdens:
College education costs are soaring
Housing costs are soaring
Healthcare costs are soaring
Jobs are diminishing
Salaries are flat
Of course parents have to help their children longer.That being said, I grew up in an abusive household, followed up by one that was incredibly unstable. I was incarcerated from most 16-21, with very little time out in the real world during that time.
Another person responding to this mentioned that parents "either pay for it now or later."
I find that to be incredibly true. I think that my mother helps me so much now because she sees how much I've struggled and how some of that struggle is inevitably due to her choices. I don't blame her, but(and this may sound incredibly entitled to some)I don't think she has too much of a right to throw me to the wolves so to speak. I can't remember a time I've been stable outside of the past 2-3 years and even now, I'm actively using IV opiates. A large chunk of my life seemed very much outside of my hands at a younger age and I don't necessarily know how much more I could've done for myself other than get to the point I'm at now.
I think a lot of people are messed up and need a lot of help. I think that if you make the decision to bring someone into this world, you don't stop being responsible for them after an arbitrary amount of rotations around the sun.
We like to think we do, but we don’t live in unique times.
Our decision making was made easy by a child who happily entered our least expensive state school, didn't mind living with us during school, and interned while in college straight into a stable job/career the day after graduation.
In rocketry terms, we had a good main engine burn to put him in GTO, now he's the ignited second stage, and we had a nominal launch.
Subtract any of the above (ideal) values, and I can see how a parent/child group can devolve into a possibly unhealthy situation.
Even with a plan for independence, the vagaries of life can easily lead the parties to want to alter the deal in light of adverse events.
provided the family can afford it, I think it's perfectly reasonable to help your offspring with stuff like food, clothing, and housing until they start making enough money that they can reasonably handle it themselves. my parents supported me enough that I never had to worry about making ends meet for essentials on top of my coursework, but it was modest enough that I was able to increase my standard of living quite a bit when I got my first full-time job and became independent.
I knew a couple people at college that would get $1000+ deposited in their account at the beginning of every month. they had a meal plan and a dorm on campus so this was just straight disposable cash. those kids had a really hard time adjusting to life after graduation. I honestly doubt they're actually independent (financially) even now.
That doesn't sound right to me.
My mother in law thinks we're raising a self-centered child because we immediately meet their needs. She's ignorant of trauma and the effects her parenting style had on my partner. She's only now learning about body autonomy. We had to ask her not to make our child the butt of jokes, especially those that play on our kid's lack of understanding or difficulty communicating clearly.
Our child only just turned one. I'm pretty sure the grandma who insists on investing in Bitcoin despite its environmental impact to further her own wealth is projecting a lot of nonsense.
That's what happens when someone raises a child to deny reality and believe in their own projected judgments: you get a confused old person who is unintentionally advising others to harm children by denying their needs.
There is nothing new to me about how she thinks. It's the norm for almost all the adults I grew up around.
How does this relate to your point about parenting?
I think the idea of kicking people out the moment they hit 18 isn't realistic anymore. Wages are not even high enough to be self-sufficient, let alone afford college without taking out exorbitant loans. Most of my college experience was spending hours past-class completing projects and doing extensive homework, so fitting in a job along with taking care of my disabled parents and trying to manage depression would've been a herculean effort. I already had to sacrifice quite a bit of my personal health in order to gamble on my college education leading to a good career.
This is just the complicated version of "youths are lazy". I find it intellectually dishonest to put the two questions in the same graph, as if one generations expectations should logically influence or be informed by the other's actions.
Some of the kids are on the track from career to job to gig to homelessness. Or jail.
students who live on campus tend to make plans very spontaneously just based on who's around. I would often get invited to do stuff fifteen minutes before driving home, and I would decline a lot of the time since I knew my parents were already halfway through making dinner. it's hard to have full agency in your social life when you live with your parents.
I hate to post low content but 'surprise_pikachu.jpg'