Hacker News Reader

Comment by perspective1 | Hacker News Reader

The actual quote is, "in the near future, cellphones are throwaways." Which is still disagreeable, but substantially different from the manufactured quote of "cellphones are throwaways." This isn't outright sham journalism, but it's not credible journalism either.

View on HN

I'm struggling to imagine how you think leaving out "in the near future" changes the meaning of that sentence in any way.

Did I miss the part where he predicted a price crash in the smartphone industry? If not, what are you talking about?

Furthermore, Apple's entire business plan goes out the door if this does indeed take place.

> I'm struggling to imagine how you think leaving out "in the near future" changes the meaning of that sentence in any way.

You're really struggling to understand how a prediction about the future is different than the state of affairs today?

Unless you can identify specific things that he thinks will be changing in the future, yes. It sure doesn't seem like smartphones are becoming any less valuable or more expendable.

Obviously that's not possible because Vice doesn't give any context. Your line of thinking has me worried-- finding context shouldn't be left as an exercise to the reader.

One reading would be "cell phones should be considered fundamentally throwaway items" vs "for the foreseeable future, people will consider them throwaway."

Reply on news.ycombinator.com