You'd be surprised (or perhaps not) at the amount of drivers who use their mobiles too while they drive.
I've always compared car vs pedestrian similar to unarmed person vs gun holder. The unarmed person has the right away ... but he or she is still unarmed and needs to remember that. That being said, I do know of streets that have sidewalks only marked by paint, so unless you're acutely watching each car from each direction, there are definitely accidents that are unavoidable for the pedestrian.
When at a crosswalk with a walk signal active and cars applying their brakes to stop, do you step out in front of those cars with the assumption that they will successfully stop, or do you wait for the cars to make a complete stop before stepping out in front of them? Assuming they'll successfully stop might be reasonable in some scenarios, but an unsafe assumption in others. It's the sort of context-dependent thing you need to be aware of regardless of what any laws written by people say. Be more wary of cars coming down hills than cars going up them. Be more wary of cars when the road is wet or icy. Be more wary of trucks than cars, particularly those that look to have heavy loads, and be more wary of cars whose brakes are squealing.
Respecting the laws of man is generally a good idea, but you must also always respect the laws of nature. The laws of man won't save you when you get on the wrong side of nature.
My priorities as a pedestrian are 1) Stay safe. 2) Obey the law. I do not count on the later to satisfy the former. I go above and beyond the requirements of (2) to satisfy the requirements of (1), because I am cognizant of my inability to sue myself back to life.
I fear perhaps some have mistaken me for a habitual driver who wants to blame pedestrians. That couldn't be further from the truth. I am a habitual pedestrian with a rational fear of drivers.
Of course drivers are to blame, but that doesn't mean there aren't things pedestrians can do to improve our odds. My point was never that drivers aren't to blame. If I had a magical wand I could wave that vaporized all cars, I'd wave it and solve the problem for good. But I don't have that and fantasizing about it won't help me. What I do have is the ability to, for example, establish eye contact with the driver of every car I step in front of.
Will that keep me safe? No. Will that make me safer? Yeah, I'm pretty sure it does.
> When running I wear reflective gear and headphones that allow outside noise in so that I can hear the road, I stay off the road in pinch points or areas of the visibility, and I still got hit when being careful."
Did you stop wearing reflective gear because of that? Probably not, because I'm sure you do actually recognize that reflective gear makes you safer even if it doesn't make you safe. That's all I've been saying. If somebody comes at you with homicidal intent, reflectors won't help [you]. But if a driver were lazy, inattentive, tired, or otherwise dangerously incompetent but lacking murderous intent, there are many things a pedestrian can do improve their odds. Or maybe you want to believe that every single driver has murderous intent and reflectors are a liability to pedestrians because they make you easier to hit, but I'm pretty sure that's not true. Supposing it were true though, the pedestrian could still opt to camouflage themselves by wearing dark clothing with poor visibility....
Just to reiterate: The possibility of the pedestrian taking defensive action does not in any way suggest that the pedestrian is at fault when they get struck.
The person with the killing power is responsible for any blood spilled. In particular in the US where most of the roads are straight and super wide, how do you not see a pedestrian approaching the curb and reduce your speed accordingly until you're out of some kind of cone of uncertainty.
(I know, American drivers just turn right while looking left at high speed because of their crazy right on red and wide roads, so they don't see the pedestrians who had 15s to cross a 4 lanes road)