Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by tontonius | Hacker News Reader

Full thread

tontonius

Is 2019 the year of the Linux desktop?

View on HN

No, but 2020 is!

Meet The Linux Desktop That Will Embarrass Windows 10 And macOS in 2020 [0]

[0] https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2019/10/18/meet-...

More re-arranging of the deck chairs will not make it the year of the Linux Desktop. Linux Desktop evangelists have been getting this wrong for 2 decades now.

It is for me. Sold my MacBook and switched to Linux. Just need to settle on a flavour.

Microsoft seems to think so.

Windows would become a very serious contender to MacOS if it becomes "unixy" like it.

It's telling of HN's demographic bias that you'd think Windows "would become a very serious contender to macOS".

There are far more people using Windows than macOS, even among developers, even if you only look at the US.

In these days when 32 gigs is the norm for developer laptops, I'd assume anything that can run a VM full screen is good enough.

I'm pretty sure the GP meant that Windows would become much more attractive to current Mac users, and I agree. A lot of serious computer work is done on Macs, because the Mac client has so much in common with the Linux server. If MS put a Windows shell on top of a Linux kernel, Windows would suddenly become a better complement to Linux servers than the Mac ever was, while still enabling work tools such as Photoshop to still be used (unlike, say, an Ubuntu client). That would make Windows a serious contender for the market of people doing production work on Macs.

You might want to pay more attention to WSL2 then.

I'm a web developer who switched from Ubuntu to Windows earlier this year and WSL has very much been a "best of both worlds" solution. Continuous improvements to VS Code and Windows Terminal have made this transition very painless and WSL2 promises to eliminate most of my remaining pet peeves (e.g. improving Docker integration).

The only downside is that the filesystem is much slower but that's only a problem when compiling native software.

With WSL2, the filesystem is faster than 'native' windows (as long as you stay within the ext4-formatted image), which obviates one of the big Windows irritants for developers.

The one downside of WSL from my perspective is all the small impedance mismatches, wslpath hacks, etc that result from having to work with the two filesystems. And though VS Codes's remote extension makes working on WSL entirely seamless, the situation is messier with other tools. IntelliJ, for example, has some WSL support in individual plugins, but it's patchy enough that I found running the Linux version via an X server more convenient.

Yeah, you elaborated on what I was trying to get at. I own both a MacBook Pro and PC desktop. If Windows is as easy to develop in as MacOS, I would move my main work there.

There are developments in there that I appreciate like Windows support for Homebrew.

When you can get Office on a Linux desktop I'll believe that.

It was a lighthearted remark, but primarily thinking of WSL. Let's face it, tiling window manager enthusiasts aside, relatively few people use Linux because of the glories of its GUI. WSL gives most people all the "desktop linux" they are likely to want.

KDE experience is far better that Windows 10

Gnome Shell is far better than Windows 10 for me.

From time to time I end up needing to figure out why someone's Windows laptop won't connect to my home wifi (where Linux, Macs, BSDs, Blackberry's and everything else connects to flawlessly) and I have to dig through the vendor-specific control panels that vary from vendor to vendor, from Windows to Windows, from OEM to OEM...

Doesn't everyone use the online version of Microsoft office now? For non-professional use, anyway.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com