The Demise of Physical Comedy
newyorker.com
newyorker.com
Further, slapstick still has a lot of life in cartoons. The old Loony Tunes and Merry Melodies were chock full of physical comedy, and modern cartoons continue to carry that torch.
Physical Comedy isn't in decline, it's just moved out of the mainstream.
I don't find slapstick, pratfalls, etc., funny anymore for different reasons. It just isn't funny. But I still enjoy Laurel & Hardy, but not for the slapstick.
It's more for the irrational logic the L&H characters use, which is on great display in the one where they move the piano up the stairs, and in the one where they sell Christmas trees door to door.
The running gags are funny because you know what is going to happen. You know the piano is going to get destroyed (who would hire L&H to move a piano, and the sound effects as the piano gets insulted are very funny in foretelling its impending demise), but somehow that makes it even funnier. You know when Ollie steps in a puddle it'll be 5 feet deep, and the funny part isn't so much him getting wet it's his long-suffering expression looking directly into the camera when he surfaces. It makes me laugh just thinking about it.
Monty Python's pratfalls aren't funny, either, but when they have a knight in armor fall down the stairs, it's not the fall that's funny, its the foley sound effect of a metal garbage can going down the stairs that's funny.
Thank you, Jim, for that great laugh!
'Austria? Well g'day, mate!'
Flash Gordon (1980) has lots of physical comedy, but that isn't the real funny stuff. It's Ming's dry wit that is comedy gold.
"Are your men on the right pills?"
Sam Kinnison as the history professor is not to be missed, either! He actually managed to upstage Rodney. Kudos to Rodney being such a great person that he allowed that.
Does the guy running behind Graham Chapham in the Holy Grail knocking two coconut halves together to mimic a horse count?
But the funniest is the crazy logic where they're trying to determine a scientific procedure to unmask a witch.
"She turned me into a newt! .... .... uh, I got better."
Part of the reason it's funny is the resolute failure of King Arthur to understand that he's not actually riding a horse. Or maybe I shouldn't try to analyze what funny is.
noun: patsy; plural noun: patsies a person who is easily taken advantage of, especially by being cheated or blamed for something.
So, there's that as well.
Monty Python's pratfalls aren't funny, either
Physical comedy isn't just "pratfalls". Consider Cleese's Ministry of Silly Walks, Blackmail, Lancelot storming the wedding, Arthur's duel with the Black Knight, or Brian's graffiti on the Roman Garrison.I don't agree with that.
Gwyneth Paltrow is amazing at physical comedy. I can't remember the movie but there's a scene where she's getting out of a cab and she just falls over and it's friggin' hilarious. No death in sight.
Certainly death, properly appreciated, is funny. The only thing more absurd than death is sex.
The reason physical comedy is so physically dangerous is that, generally, it's only funny if you go for it and that naturally causes injuries. Like playing football, or WWE wrestling. Half-assing it isn't going to be entertaining.
To me physical comedy is about physicality: the body, its gestures and movements.
Can it involve pain or the possibility of death? Sure, but that's not essential.
I was always a fan of John Ritter in Three's Company. He'd flail about in every episode, almost falling or tripping or just making crazy expressions with his face.
His fight scenes and stunts are riddled with humor.
They are not physiotherapists, who actually practice useful rehabilitation.
A big draw for the old timey sketches used to be "how did they do it?!", even though the audience was aware that the performers weren't literally an inch away from death. Today it would just be written off as mediocre CGI.
Next time you watch one, try tapping your feet to the moves. You'll see :-)
In the one in Shanghai Nights, they didn't even leave it to your imagination, the whole scene was choreographed to Singin' in the Rain.
I miss the days when stuntmen got top billing. Harold Lloyd, Douglas Fairbanks, Errol Flynn and Buster Keaton were all awesome.
The talking heads have made it illegal to be a great stunt performer in Hollywood. If you're into that kind of thing you need to get a Red Bull sponsorship, join the Cirque du Soleil, or take up skateboarding.
I heard Jackie Chan talk about in an interview. All those great funny stunts aren't really due to anyone's amazing talent. They would just shoot as many takes as they had to. And that's just more expensive.
I didn't get the impression Jackie said there wasn't talent. Talent is part of the equation, but yes, he openly stated it still took a lot of tries to get right. Most of his movies feature failed tries at the end to give you an idea.
But a recent example of a well done pratfall I saw in a show mostly about dialog and editing was Modern Family (season 2) where Cameron turns to give his husband a kiss who pulls back (due to discomfort with public displays of affection, the theme of the episode) and Cameron overleans and falls head over heels over the back of the sofa quite roughly; he’s a big guy too. I laughed a lot partly in surprise because I basically never see a pratfall in comedy shows I like.
Of course my wife was only mildly amused, and she loves Oh Hello. No accounting for taste in humor, I suppose.
[0] https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/the-play-that...
It may be that physical comedy has a better impact in theater, where it's live, and they're taking the (apparent) risks right in front of you. On film, modern wire work enables a lot of great action, but undercuts the immediacy of it. Jackie Chan did amazing physical comedy on film, because you knew that he was taking Harold Lloyd-type risks.
Physical comedy in the theater is a bit like stage magic: it's practiced carefully and controlled so that they can do it safely every single time. Professional wrestling is also a kind of live physical comedy, taking much bigger risks than any actor would do (and way more than the actors' unions would tolerate).
For example the show "The Trailerpark Boys" have reoccurring gags which depend on slapstick physical humour, and they always make me laugh.
The slapstick comedy of the 1930's could be viewed with no context or even sound. I think it's evolved since then, the context (characters, plot, motivations) of the physical comedy matters a lot more now...
Visual comedy could be made in the editing, backgrounds, etc (as in many examples given in the video) even if the actors don't do physical comedy at all.
https://www.facebook.com/cbc/videos/healthy-eating-is-simple...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkBb4FWHxhI
Here's where you know Bill Irwin from, depending on your age:
- voice and motions for TARS in Interstellar
- repeat character on Law and Order: SVU
- Mr. Noodle on Sesame Street
- main cast member in Legion (one of the Cary Loudermilks)
Bill is proof that physical comedy is still relevant.
As culture evolves, and as new ideas grow, you can mine intellectual and verbal discourse for comedy that will continue to be surprising.
Can you do the same with physical comedy? Are there new boundaries or new frontiers to mine there?
I feel nothing reading that. Should I? I mean, isn't that... reinforcing isms we were striving to overcome as a society?
I think that slapstick is simply overdone. We've seen so much of it that it's just not funny anymore...
The demise of comedy in general is a much more pertinent issue. Political correctness and outrage culture has hobbled the ability to confront hard subjects through humor.
Have you not seen the bit by.. Josh Johnson? ... where he accidentally catfishes the KKK?
Or watched Frankie Boyle? Or the Mash Report?
It is pretty obvious there is plenty of comedy out there that approaches difficult and tough subjects through humor. Society is becoming less tolerant of racism and sexism and homophobia and things like that - you know, the political correctness of it. If your comedy includes making fun of men for being too "gay" or women for being too manly... sure, political correctness has caused a demise in your sort of humor, and good riddance.
There are plenty of logical inconsistencies, fallacies, half-truths, that every social tribe adopts that need a mirror to reveal their ridiculousness. Some may only be observed as an outsider from the group.
This is the service comedy has always provided.
We are humans. We are fallible.
But really, they were examples of comedy that the person claimed was hobbled as a result of political correctness - and I don't see it as the case at all. Comedy simply isn't what it was 30 years ago, but at the same time... comedy isn't what it was 50 years ago either.
The very idea that there couldn't be any funny perspectives left on the above topics shows that the idea of being emotionally protected has been elevated above free speech.
The vocal minority of Twitter do not represent the general public. https://www.pewinternet.org/2019/04/24/sizing-up-twitter-use...
I feel like the "demise of comedy" is overstated. Every time I see a comedian complaining about that, his netflix special is just a few clicks away.
Or at least know something about their experiences and come from a place of those experiences being real. I think a major reason that e.g. anti-LGBT jokes don't land the way they used to is simply that too many people know anything at all about LGBT experiences. Comedians can't get away with just making stuff up or leaning on cartoonish stereotypes, because it just rings hollow to so many people now. Likewise, "white guy does X like this / black guy does X like this" jokes are so dead that even jokes about the ineffectiveness of those jokes are trite.
> Every time I see a comedian complaining about that, his netflix special is just a few clicks away.
Also, even when comedians are ostensibly telling actual jokes about "political correctness" or "safe spaces", it often comes off as somewhere between inept trolling and outright whining. Somebody could probably make a "Stand-up comedy bit about political correctness or Rush Limbaugh rant?" quiz.