[1] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-usa-crash-parents...
[1] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-usa-crash-parents...
“[The American Service Members Protection Act] authorizes the U.S. president to use ‘all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court.’ This authorization has led the act to be nicknamed the ‘Hague Invasion Act.’”
But it doesn’t apply to all Americans. Technically, it only applies to Americans connected to the military, although I would expect similar efforts to apply for several other important people.
It’s definitely an interesting situation.
Additionally, the RAF base her husband was stationed at is legally considered an annex of the US Embassy in London, so arguably she did have diplomatic immunity at that point in time.
She has since returned to the US which means diplomatic immunity no longer applies to her, but as far as I can see, she was covered by immunity at the time of the incident.
https://grberridge.diplomacy.edu/the-sacoolas-affair-diploma...
I also retract my assertion regarding the annexation of the base — I can't see that it has any legal basis to it other than a political exercise by the Government.