I'm not in favor of managing information flow to the general public so they "trust" the source. What if a member of the public reads this, and learns more about the topic. Is that a bad outcome?
There is too much of it, and it's contradictory. Someone who is interested in SCN2A could scan the abstrats of the SfN conference in a few days to find everything they need. But too much echoing of preliminary results in popular media creates false expectations and contradictions all the time. People absolutely should have access to preliminary scientific literature, just not through the popular press maybe