When the Student Newspaper Is the Only Daily Paper in Town
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
It was the local counter culture weekly, The City Pulse, that first broke the story of Dr. Naser, the MSU sexual predator. The City Pulse was also the only press that reported Sparrow Hospital had failed a federal inspection and was in danger of losing their certification. Sparrow execs went out and confiscated every paper they could find in a ten mile radius of the hospital to prevent the story from spreading.
Personal note Ed Vielmetti quoted in the article is a friend who helped me write the the open data legislation we're trying to pass here in Michigan.
I find that smaller newspapers don't have the money to perform real investigations and will push stories out based on rumor and speculation.
Here’s a twitter thread from Crains Detroit which talks about how the quality of this article is kind of crappy.
https://twitter.com/chadlivengood/status/1185581429339643904...
MLive is addressed in the article.
I lived in Ann Arbor when the old paper went under and after. MLive was and is worse by a far margin. It’s always been of the same ilk as the low-quality, corporate media consolidation going on across the country.
1) Double politicians (or leftover politicians). Most of English speaking world has left over votes with no representative, have politicians elected with leftover votes. These are paid positions with no power. They will keep the elected politicians in check and can do local journalism. Otherwise those politicians who may get up to 50% of the vote, will stop working for those potential voters by going back to their lives.
2) Citizen news. Government allows citizens to post anything on their personal blogs/columns/newspapers. It has the side effect of being historical because, the government will forever host it vs losing information when the company/individual no longer hosts it for whatever reason. Registration is simply getting username/password from local government with ID.
Both of these require that the government recognise that some information is better than nothing and an essential need if there is have democracy. To do otherwise, is to let evil continue under the veil (Corruption, abuse, etc). Those who would be against 'information needs to be free and widely available', you guessed it, evil.
Realistically the major impediment is the old news media. Although they have done admirable work keeping everyone informed they are simply not as able to provide the same quick response time, relevance and breadth of opinion as some combination of twitter/specialist websites/the emerging podcast circuits.
Democracy will be fine. If anything, the media is an impediment to democracy making it harder for polities to communicate directly. That was fine in the past when there was no better option; but that has changed.
So, while you're seeing more sources personally, it's actually getting harder to get the fine details and local news all over world because information is so cheap to distribute. My suggestions essentially offer a platform for distribution and paid defacto journalists (politicians).
30 years ago I would probably have struggled to compare media reporting of what a politician said to what a transcript but today that is no trouble at all. This newfound capability has trashed my trust in any political journalist.