Is the uptime really technically true? Sure, the Voyager has been operating for 40+ years, but all embedded systems must have watchdog timers. And given how hostile the space environment is, I'll be surprised if the main system hasn't been reset by a watchdog timer for a couple of times to recover from fault conditions, thus the actual uptime must be much less than that.
"Practically all of Voyager's redundancy is gone now, either because something broke along the way or it was turned off to conserve power. Of the 11 original instruments on Voyager 1, only five remain"
Though I did wonder if they updated the firmware/code in all this time and als no definitive answer stood out: https://www.quora.com/Was-the-opportunity-to-update-the-Voya...
https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/news/details.php?article_id=16
It suddenly started returning corrupted frames. So engineers had it slowly transmit a core dump, and found a single flipped bit. To fix the problem, they "reset" the computer, which I assume means they rebooted it.
> Most spacecraft have more than one Command Loss Timer Reset for subsystem level safety reasons, with the Voyager craft using at least 7 of these timers.
I was not implying that "the fact that the system has been rebooted lessens the achievement", I said none of it. I was just wondering about details of the system and technical accuracy of the statement, isn't it the point of posting on HN?
Running a probe for 15,364 days without even a single bit flip or poweroff would be an extraordinary miracle that exceeded all reasonable expectations, not simply the grestest accomplishment.
Please don't assume that every technical statements/questions imply undervaluation, criticism or attack, regardless of how common they are in tech.
Thanks.