„ It's no secret that they are ideologically driven, although they kept it under lid until 2015 when they then flipped finger to their own rules and abused the platform for political causes.“
Anil Dash?
Anil Dash?
This is the post Joel Spolsky posted, breaking the user rules that stated among other things that political posts where not allowed:
https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/297859/can-stack-ov...
Then, a couple of years later -
https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/342440/time-to-take...
at the same time Sam Altman posted his (since I mentioned Y Combinator, but in fairness, at his own blog):
https://blog.samaltman.com/time-to-take-a-stand
These are political, ideological driven posts. Not everyone agrees with the political content; the point being, whether you do or not, this doesn't belong on a site such as SO.
And the international agenda I am refering to is in particular United Nations' agenda 2030 which is also rooted in ideology, and is what these companies are working with, directly or indirectly:
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingo...
Where were these rules? I've never seen such prohibition.
> "Bigotry of any kind. Language likely to offend or alienate individuals or groups based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, etc. will not be tolerated. At all. (Those are just a few examples; when in doubt, just don't.)"
"etc." => politics, in this case back-ref "Language likely to offend or alienate individuals or groups" as not everyone agrees with the political message(s) posted, and the use of the platform users signed up on for entirely different purposes.
> international agenda I am referring to is in particular United Nations' agenda 2030
This is conspiracist nonsense, attributing a bottom-up progressive movement to a top-down international organisation that actually isn't progressive at all (and is in fact dangerous to certain activists).